Closed Bug 1777415 Opened 2 years ago Closed 2 years ago

Contacts having only `Organization`, but not `First/Last/Display Name`, appear blank in Contact list after migrating from 91 to 102

Categories

(Thunderbird :: Address Book, defect, P3)

Thunderbird 102

Tracking

(thunderbird_esr102+ fixed, thunderbird104 fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
105 Branch
Tracking Status
thunderbird_esr102 + fixed
thunderbird104 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: mike.duncan, Assigned: mkmelin)

References

(Blocks 2 open bugs)

Details

(Keywords: regression, ux-control)

Attachments

(2 files, 1 obsolete file)

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:101.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/101.0

Steps to reproduce:

In Release 91 and earlier, it was possible to have contacts without First, Last name when it represented an organization. Display name was filled with Organization name. Automatic migration to Release 102, resulted in several contact items appearing as blank in the Contact List (2nd column). Details showed me what had happened because I could see Organization field filled.

Actual results:

The address book looked empty of entries until scrolling past the blank entries (no First/Last name).

Expected results:

Display Name should have been filled when migrating.

Hi Mike, thanks for reporting this. Since the behaviour regressed, let's mark it as defect.
I agree that this should be looked into. We have similar problem when filling only organization field for a new contact. I suspect how people used this might not yet be fully understood by the design team.

Severity: -- → S3
Type: enhancement → defect
Component: Untriaged → Address Book
Priority: -- → P3
Summary: Migrating contacts (91 to 102) with only Display Name, appear blank in Contact list → Contacts having only `Organization`, but not `First/Last/Display Name`, appear blank in Contact list after migrating from 91 to 102

Reporter's screenshot 1: Contact has a name in organization field, but display name remains empty (where TB 91 would fill the gap with organization)

Attachment #9283571 - Attachment filename: Missing Display Name.pdf → Missing Display Name.xxx
Attachment #9283571 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #9283571 - Attachment mime type: application/pdf → text/plain
See Also: → 1779805
Assignee: nobody → mkmelin+mozilla
Status: UNCONFIRMED → ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed: true
Target Milestone: --- → 105 Branch

Pushed by mkmelin@iki.fi:
https://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/e55e84720070
Display contacts having only Organization, but not First/Last/Display Name reasonably. r=aleca

Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 2 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED

Comment on attachment 9287183 [details]
Bug 1777415 - Display contacts having only Organization, but not First/Last/Display Name reasonably. r=aleca

[Approval Request Comment]
Regression caused by (bug #): new ab
User impact if declined: empty showing org contact
Testing completed (on c-c, etc.): daily
Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): safe

Attachment #9287183 - Flags: approval-comm-esr102?
Attachment #9287183 - Flags: approval-comm-beta?

Comment on attachment 9287183 [details]
Bug 1777415 - Display contacts having only Organization, but not First/Last/Display Name reasonably. r=aleca

[Triage Comment]
Approved for beta

Attachment #9287183 - Flags: approval-comm-beta? → approval-comm-beta+

Comment on attachment 9287183 [details]
Bug 1777415 - Display contacts having only Organization, but not First/Last/Display Name reasonably. r=aleca

[Triage Comment]
Approved for esr102

Attachment #9287183 - Flags: approval-comm-esr102? → approval-comm-esr102+
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: