Closed
Bug 178313
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
/names command fails to show output for other channels
Categories
(Other Applications :: ChatZilla, defect)
Other Applications
ChatZilla
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: bugzilla-mozilla-20000923, Assigned: rginda)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: cz-patch)
Attachments
(1 file, 4 obsolete files)
1.74 KB,
patch
|
rginda
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021029 Phoenix/0.4 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021029 Phoenix/0.4 When using the /names command, the returned output from the server fails to be displayed unless it's for the current channel, or you've done "/names" in the channel in question. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Join the IRC server specified (though any should do). 2. Join two channels (suggested one: #testing1 and #testing2). 3. In #testing1, do the command "/names #testing2". 4. Then switch to #testing2, and do "/names". 5. Switch back to #testing1, and do "/names #testing2" again. Actual Results: First "/names #testing2" seems to do nothing. Second "/names #testing2" shows user list for #testing2, albeit in the wrong tab. :) Expected Results: Both times should show the output, preferably always in the current tab.
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
What appears to happening here is that chatzilla tries to send the /names output to the channel you're checking, and if that view doesn't exist, it just goes away.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Hardware: PC → All
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
Removed unnecessary CIRCChannel.pendingNamesReply.
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #117296 -
Flags: review?(rginda)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 117296 [details] [diff] [review] patch pendingNamesReply is not useless. That's what keeps the NAMES messages sent in response to a JOIN from showing up in the message window. With this patch, join a channel that has users, and you'll see something like... [INFO] Channel view for “#chatzilla” opened. -->| YOU have joined #chatzilla =-= Topic for #chatzilla is “Welcome to #chatzilla. *Questions about ChatZilla only, please. Click <irc://undernet/chatzone> for general chat.* For bug fixes and new features, upgrade to version 0.8.24 at <http://www.hacksrus.com/~ginda/chatzilla/>” =-= Topic for #chatzilla was set by rginda on Fri Mar 07 2003 15:42:38 GMT-0800 (PST) === rginda_ Silver juna_work @ssieb_work Lissyx @rginda moj Isomer @ssieb_home @killer --- End of /NAMES list.
Attachment #117296 -
Flags: review?(rginda) → review-
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #117348 -
Flags: review?(rginda)
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
The previous patch doesn't consider multibyte channel names.
Attachment #117296 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #117348 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
Added the channel name before the nicknames. Removed "End of /NAMES list" message. It's meaningless.
Attachment #117420 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #117758 -
Flags: review?(rginda)
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
I don't think it's meaningless. Most irc clients show it, and it lets the user know the server is done sending names. If the channel has many users, there will be multiple names replies. If the server load is high, there might be a delay between the names replies. The end of names message lets you know it's all done. Other than that the patch looks great.
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
Restored "End of /NAMES list" message and added the channel name before it.
Attachment #117758 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #117774 -
Flags: review?(rginda)
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 117774 [details] [diff] [review] patch v5 r=rginda
Attachment #117774 -
Flags: review?(rginda) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Whiteboard: cz-patch
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
The patch was checked in.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #117348 -
Flags: review?(rginda)
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #117758 -
Flags: review?(rginda)
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Core → Other Applications
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•