Signing a CLA with the the webpack organization
Categories
(mozilla.org :: Licensing, task)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: julienw, Assigned: mhoye)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
61.97 KB,
application/pdf
|
Details |
Hi,
I'd like to submit a simple patch to webpack [1], and we need a CLA for that.
I attached the CLA to this mail, but the signature should happen though docusign. The steps are outlined in [2], and it looks like I mostly need an email so that the docusign can be sent.
Thanks!
[1] https://github.com/webpack/webpack.js.org/pull/6373
[2] https://github.com/openjs-foundation/EasyCLA#have-your-company-sign-for-you
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•3 years ago
|
||
Hey Mike, do you think this could happen? thanks :-)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•3 years ago
|
||
I think it could, but we will need to get a green light from an Actual Lawyer Person, not Amateurs Such As Myself. Thankfully, we have some excellent Actual Lawyer Persons on the team.
Daniel, could I trouble you to take a glance at this? I don't see anything egregious in it, though section 7 would give me pause if a contribution necessarily involved dependencies. I suspect you might be on the hook for the "Initial CLA Manager" role described in the agreement as well.
Comment 3•3 years ago
|
||
I'll take a look today
Comment 4•3 years ago
|
||
Hi Julien - We've already signed the OpenJS Foundation CLA - there's a bug for Mozillians who want to getting added as contributors under that CLA here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1721221
General info about CLAs with links to relevant bugs is available in the Software Licensing Runbook: https://mana.mozilla.org/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=130927170
(We're working on getting that Runbook more visibility within the company)
Once you've commented on that other bug (see 1721221 for the instructions) I can email you with details for navigated the CLA bot
| Reporter | ||
Comment 5•3 years ago
|
||
Thanks for the links!
Description
•