Closed
Bug 180291
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
OpenVMS build -> GNV: LDAP Changes
Categories
(Directory Graveyard :: LDAP C SDK, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla1.3
People
(Reporter: colin, Assigned: mcs)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
7.94 KB,
patch
|
mcs
:
review+
brendan
:
superreview+
asa
:
approval1.3a+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
This bug report will track the LDAP changes with the "move OpenVMS build to GNV"
work (meta-bug 180288).
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
Mark, could you start the review process please, and tell me how many levels of
review I need for LDAP modules. Thanks.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
Yes, I will review these changes soon. At a glance I don't see anything risky
(not likely to break other platforms) with the possible exception of the
libldap/open.c change (I will have to look at that more closely).
As for the review process, the Mozilla client builds currently do not pick up
the LDAP code from the trunk; they pull from ldapcsdk_50_client_branch. If you
just want these changes on the trunk, I can review them. If you want them on the
LDAP branch that is used by the Mozilla client then we need a module owner
approval (from me), one review (which I will do), a superreview, and approval to
commit.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
The open.c changes is inside an existing #ifdef VMS, so its not going to break
anyone else.
The changes need to go into ldapcsdk_50_client_branch, so that Mozilla picks
them up.
Once you're reviewed can you tell me who I should go to for superview and
checkin approval.
Many thanks.
| Reporter | ||
Updated•23 years ago
|
Attachment #106353 -
Flags: review?(mcs)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
I REALLY need to get these changes in for OpenVMS, and I'd like to do so before
Thanksgiving. Its been 11 days since I posted the patch. If you can't review the
patch at this time, can you suggest someone else who can? I need to move
forward. Thanks, Colin.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 106353 [details] [diff] [review]
LDAP changes
Sorry for the delay. r=mcs.
Attachment #106353 -
Flags: superreview?
Attachment #106353 -
Flags: review?(mcs)
Attachment #106353 -
Flags: review+
| Assignee | ||
Updated•23 years ago
|
Attachment #106353 -
Flags: superreview?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 7•23 years ago
|
||
Thanks Mark. Should I just request the super-review from any of the usual gang,
or is there a preferred super-reviewer for ldap?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
No preferred SR'r... I just posted a request to the newsgroup.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
| Reporter | ||
Comment 9•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 106353 [details] [diff] [review]
LDAP changes
Looking for a superreviewer
Attachment #106353 -
Flags: superreview?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 10•23 years ago
|
||
This is blocking my work on Mozilla 1.3. Setting severity and milestone fields
according.
Severity: normal → blocker
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.3
Comment 11•23 years ago
|
||
making a non-specific super-review request probably isn't gonna do much good.
you're much more likely to get a response if you make the request of a specific
super-reviewer.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 12•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 106353 [details] [diff] [review]
LDAP changes
Brendan, could you sr this please.
Attachment #106353 -
Flags: superreview? → superreview?(brendan)
Comment 13•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 106353 [details] [diff] [review]
LDAP changes
rs=brendan@mozilla.org, cc'd seawood in case he has anything to add.
/be
Attachment #106353 -
Flags: superreview?(brendan) → superreview+
Comment 14•23 years ago
|
||
wfm
| Assignee | ||
Updated•23 years ago
|
Attachment #106353 -
Flags: approval1.3a?
Comment 15•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 106353 [details] [diff] [review]
LDAP changes
a=asa for checkin to 1.3a
Attachment #106353 -
Flags: approval1.3a? → approval1.3a+
| Reporter | ||
Comment 16•23 years ago
|
||
Checked in to trunk.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•