Closed Bug 180398 Opened 23 years ago Closed 23 years ago

after three links in a site the call for ../s.css fails

Categories

(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, defect)

x86
Windows 98
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

VERIFIED INVALID

People

(Reporter: alan, Assigned: dbaron)

Details

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016 I am working offline creating a 'site' that is an album of photographs. This will be distributed on CD. For each file the html is trivial and basic. There are 15 to 25 photographs in each of the smaller files, totalling about 3 Mb. Larger files have over 100 pictures, over 20 Mb. Each file is in its own window. They interlink. They all use an external css file in the parent window called by @import url(../s.css) Much testing with IE shows no problem. Using Mozilla after three links forward the css fails. The route is immaterial, simply any four files in succession. On the failure, view source shows the forward slash in the css call as a backslash ! It is a forward slash in the file. I have made some small demonstration files which do not fail. I hope I can put something on a website that shows the problem before Monday. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Hi, Did you try it with netscape communicator 4.06 or higher if you have not please try it and e-mail me at wellander3@netscape.net if it works in i.e. it should work in communicator 4.06 and above and it sholud work in mozilla abu for some reason it is not according to your report. And did you deign it for all web browsers or just I.E.
Hi, i that worg is design and but
So if we ignore bryan's rambling.... Alan, any chance you could zip up the files involved and attach them to this bug using http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?bugid=180398&action=enter ? It would be nice to be able reproduce the problem so it can be debugged.
I will post files before Monday. I am not into zipping, it will be quicker to set the machine going and do something else while it grinds away. I assume you all have broadband. Regards Alan
We were hoping the files involved would be, say, a few kilobytes at most.
The reason for zipping (or tarring, or whatever) is to preserve filenames and relative paths... since you apparently have multiple files in various places in the directory hierarchy. ;)
I have to be very very sorry. I found a backslash was in the file. No bug.
OK, then, thanks INVALID
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
rsv
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.