Closed Bug 1807221 Opened 1 year ago Closed 1 year ago

6.29% perf_reftest_singletons attr-selector-1.html (OSX) regression on Sun December 18 2022

Categories

(Core :: Panning and Zooming, defect, P3)

defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED INVALID
Tracking Status
firefox-esr102 --- unaffected
firefox108 --- unaffected
firefox109 --- unaffected
firefox110 --- affected

People

(Reporter: afinder, Unassigned)

References

(Regression)

Details

(4 keywords)

Perfherder has detected a talos performance regression from push 00fb6658b130058d5f54ed8850092c29f806f2a0. As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.

Regressions:

Ratio Test Platform Options Absolute values (old vs new)
6% perf_reftest_singletons attr-selector-1.html macosx1015-64-shippable-qr e10s fission stylo webrender 116.91 -> 124.26

Details of the alert can be found in the alert summary, including links to graphs and comparisons for each of the affected tests. Please follow our guide to handling regression bugs and let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) may be backed out in accordance with our regression policy.

If you need the profiling jobs you can trigger them yourself from treeherder job view or ask a sheriff to do that for you.

For more information on performance sheriffing please see our FAQ.

Flags: needinfo?(drobertson)

Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1488886

Looking at the graph this seems like just noise. Sure, the graph goes up on the push for bug 1488886, but the graph is down again a couple pushes later, and then up again later, and then down again.

(In reply to Timothy Nikkel (:tnikkel) from comment #2)

Looking at the graph this seems like just noise. Sure, the graph goes up on the push for bug 1488886, but the graph is down again a couple pushes later, and then up again later, and then down again.

Yeah the standard deviation seems to be quite large with this test measurement at the moment... If this seems to continue, it may be worth looking into... If this does seem to be an issue, then bug 1805957 should be prioritized a bit.

Flags: needinfo?(drobertson)
Priority: -- → P3
Severity: -- → S3

The 30 day graph seems to look fairly flat. It looks a bit more like the increase was just noise. If you disagree, let me know and I can begin to investigate a bit more.

Flags: needinfo?(afinder)

Closing the alert and defect since the graph values have dropped around Dec 19th.

Flags: needinfo?(afinder)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 1 year ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.