WARNING: Found a non-root APZ with no handoff parent: file gfx/layers/apz/src/APZCTreeManager.cpp:2887'
Categories
(Core :: Panning and Zooming, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr102 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox108 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox109 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox110 | --- | wontfix |
| firefox111 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: hiro, Assigned: dlrobertson)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(1 file)
STR;
- Open https://bug1796942.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=9300038
- Try to scroll the sub scroller in the page by mouse wheel or pan gesture
Note that there's a wheel event listener calling preventDefault() if the event happens outside of the sub scroller.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 1•3 years ago
|
||
Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1379458
:dlrobertson, since you are the author of the regressor, bug 1379458, could you take a look?
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•3 years ago
|
||
Now that fixed position content will have the mScrollParentId set to the
null scroll parent id, the warning posted for non-root APZC's overscrolled
with a null scroll parent id is no longer valid.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 3•3 years ago
|
||
Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1379458
Comment 5•3 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
Comment 6•3 years ago
|
||
The patch landed in nightly and beta is affected.
:dlrobertson, is this bug important enough to require an uplift?
- If yes, please nominate the patch for beta approval.
- If no, please set
status-firefox110towontfix.
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•3 years ago
|
||
How user visible are our warnings? While I'm fairly certain bug 1809574 should be uplifted, I'm don't think this patch needs to be uplifted if a spurious warning is not a big deal.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 8•3 years ago
|
||
Is there a way I can manually test this? I see no difference in scrolling the link from description between the affected build 110.0a1(20230105213109) and the build with the fix 111.0b8(20230302185836). Thank you.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•3 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Monica Chiorean from comment #8)
Is there a way I can manually test this? I see no difference in scrolling the link from description between the affected build 110.0a1(20230105213109) and the build with the fix 111.0b8(20230302185836). Thank you.
You could see a WARNING line in your terminal if you follow the STR with a bad build.
Description
•