New classic theme needed for Microsoft Windows Vista

RESOLVED INCOMPLETE

Status

SeaMonkey
Themes
--
enhancement
RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
16 years ago
5 years ago

People

(Reporter: Jason Chambers, Unassigned)

Tracking

Trunk
x86
Windows Vista

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

Attachments

(4 attachments)

(Reporter)

Description

16 years ago
User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021120
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021120

With the new leak of Windows Longhorn out there, I had run moz in its classic
mode and, well to quote a friend: "it's sabotage! theyre trying to make moz so
ugly no one will use it"

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Pir8 Longhorn
2. Install Longhorn
3. Run Mozilla in Classic Theme

Actual Results:  
Butt ugly display

Expected Results:  
Pretty mozilla

This would be marked as fixed later i bet, but just thought I put it out there.
(Reporter)

Comment 1

16 years ago
Created attachment 106999 [details]
Screenshot of Mozilla Classic on Longhorn

heres your first glance, enjoy! :)
What exactly is wrong?  Looks like mozilla is correctly picking up the current
OS skin and using that for the display, no?
(Reporter)

Comment 3

16 years ago
Nothing, other than its butt ugly. The colours of the icons are blending in too
well to make it hard to see. And besides, have you no sense of humor?
I have a sense of humor.  Bugzilla, however, often does not.

Seriously, what is the expected behavior here?  It's the classic theme; it
should be picking up the OS widget styling; that's what it seems to be doing. 
Is it doing it incorrectly?  If it is, that's a bug, of course.

A screenshot of a "native" app would be nice here, basically.
(Reporter)

Comment 5

16 years ago
Created attachment 107042 [details]
Native apps

Here is the native apps look that you wanted with longhorn so you can do some
looking around... more to be attached!
(Reporter)

Comment 6

16 years ago
Created attachment 107043 [details]
IE vs. Mozilla

Here is a look at IE vs Mozilla classic theme, you can see that there are some
minor changes to be made. Such as white text instead of black, and separator
lines being too big. Other than that, just some cosmetic problems which I'll
post next.
(Reporter)

Comment 7

16 years ago
Created attachment 107044 [details]
Mozilla cosmetic bug

This is the bug I have noticed while playing with mozilla within longhorn (all
of 5 minutes) This is an image of the file selection screen when posting an
attachment to bugzilla. Bottom left has the screen shot of Mozillas file picker
while the top right has the screen shot of IEs file picker. The easy navigation
bar on the Mozilla file upload is missing. But I'll keep playing with it and
see what else is off.

Obviously this bug wont be looked at right away since this is only a very early
build at LongHorn, but at least its a good thing to peak at right?
To themes.  Yes, we should be picking up the font color.
Assignee: other → shliang
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Layout → Themes
Ever confirmed: true
QA Contact: ian → pmac

Comment 9

13 years ago
This bug should probably be updated now that Windows Vista Beta 1 is out, not to
mention the fact that Mozilla has changed significantly since 1.3a (which the
reporter was using when the bug was filed).

Updated

12 years ago
Assignee: shliang → nobody
OS: Other → Windows Vista
QA Contact: pmac → themes
Updating title to Vista

What to do with this bug report? 
Firefox 3 plan already includes a visual refresh to better support vista theme

Duplicate of Bug 333484?
Summary: New classic theme needed for Microsoft Windows Longhorn XP → New classic theme needed for Microsoft Windows Vista

Comment 11

10 years ago
How about SeaMonkey on final Vista Release?
(Assignee)

Updated

10 years ago
Product: Core → SeaMonkey

Comment 12

5 years ago
Resolving as INCOMPLETE. I don't think anyone cares for Vista these days (Windows 8 is already out).
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.