Add a test that RFP is correctly applied in partitioned Service Workers
Categories
(Core :: Privacy: Anti-Tracking, enhancement)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: tjr, Assigned: tjr)
Details
(Whiteboard: [fpp:m5])
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
|
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details | Review | |
|
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
RyanVM
:
approval-mozilla-esr115+
|
Details | Review |
This code is designed to handle the case where we have only a URI and OA, and need to determine if we should exempt from RFP or not. The URI might be a subdocument underneath a top-level document (the top-level document would be the partitionKey, either mFirstPartyDomain or mPartitionKey)
AFAIK the only place we actually need this is for Service Workers - but we definitely need it. We should take an existing Service Worker test that involved partitionKeys and add an RFP check into it.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•2 years ago
|
||
Depends on D179106
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•2 years ago
|
||
I find myself requently rewriting a subset of these
logging statements all the time, so maybe we should
just put them in the code
Depends on D179107
Comment 3•2 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9335927 [details]
WIP: Bug 1835099: RFP Debug Logging
Revision D179108 was moved to bug 1825561. Setting attachment 9335927 [details] to obsolete.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 5•2 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•2 years ago
|
||
[Tracking Requested - why for this release]: I would like to uplift this to ESR 115 for Tor Browser, so they do not have to carry the patch.
Updated•2 years ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•2 years ago
|
||
Depends on D183523
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•2 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9343778 [details]
Bug 1835099: Check the Partition Key in both flows (ESR) r=timhuang
The ESR 115 Landing Order is Bug 1825561 -> Bug 1835099 -> Bug 1842678
ESR Uplift Approval Request
- If this is not a sec:{high,crit} bug, please state case for ESR consideration: This patch is needed for correct application of RFP to service workers when a domain is exempted. Otherwise
- User impact if declined: It's necessary for Tor, so they will need to carry the patch if we don't uplift it.
- Fix Landed on Version:
- Risk to taking this patch: Low
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): Only affects users with RFP enabled
Comment 9•2 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9343778 [details]
Bug 1835099: Check the Partition Key in both flows (ESR) r=timhuang
Approved for 115.1esr.
Comment 10•2 years ago
|
||
| uplift | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Description
•