Closed Bug 183749 Opened 23 years ago Closed 23 years ago

Mozilla 1.2.1 (Xft) does not enumerate all of the system fonts in Red Hat 8.0

Categories

(Core :: Layout: Text and Fonts, defect)

x86
Linux
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED INVALID

People

(Reporter: dirgon, Assigned: blizzard)

References

Details

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021202 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021202 Previous builds used to enumarate all fonts on the system, but now with build 1.2.1 (Xft) I no longer see any of the Nimbus fonts. The only fonts I see are Luxi Sans, Luxi Serif, Luxi Mono, Bitstream Charter, and a couple of courier fonts. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Previous Xft builds, or non-Xft builds? Are the fonts you mentioned truetype fonts?
Assignee: font → blizzard
Blocks: xft_tracking
By previous builds, I was referring to previous Xft builds properly enumerated the list of fonts from Red Hat. I do not believe the fonts in question are truetype fonts. They are installed with Red Hat 8.0 when I installed it fresh on a new machine. Actually, I have never installed any truetype fonts on my linux box, so I would surmise that they are not truetype.
The Nimbus fonts do show up on my pretty stock RH 8.0 system. What does fc-list on the command line show you? That should enumerate all of the fonts.
Below is the list that fc-list shows, but this is not all the fonts that show in all apps like Konqueror and others. Also, I do not understand what changed between 1.2 and 1.2.1, because with the releases of 1.2b (xft) and 1.2 (xft) I had a much different font list from what I have now showing in the release of 1.2.1 (xft). The fonts in question (Nimbus), by the way are from the ZZ_Abiword family according to xfontsel. fc-list shows the following: Luxi Serif:style=Regular Utopia:style=Bold Italic ZYSong18030:style=regular Luxi Serif:style=Bold AR PL SungtiL GB:style=Regular Kochi Mincho:style=Regular Luxi Mono:style=Bold Utopia:style=Bold Bitstream Charter:style=Bold Italic Luxi Sans:style=Bold Courier:style=Bold Italic Luxi Sans:style=Regular Courier:style=Regular AR PL KaitiM GB:style=Regular Cursor:style=Regular Bitstream Charter:style=Regular Kochi Gothic:style=Regular Baekmuk Batang:style=Regular Courier 10 Pitch:style=Bold Italic Luxi Mono:style=Regular Bitstream Charter:style=Italic AR PL KaitiM Big5:style=Regular Courier 10 Pitch:style=Italic Utopia:style=Italic LucidaTypewriter:style=Regular LucidaTypewriter:style=Bold Luxi Serif:style=Oblique Luxi Serif:style=Bold Oblique Luxi Mono:style=Oblique Courier 10 Pitch:style=Regular Luxi Sans:style=Oblique Baekmuk Headline:style=Regular Fangsong ti:style=Regular Courier:style=Italic AR PL Mingti2L Big5:style=Reguler Baekmuk Dotum:style=Regular Courier 10 Pitch:style=Bold Luxi Sans:style=Bold Oblique Luxi Mono:style=Bold Oblique Courier:style=Bold Utopia:style=Regular Bitstream Charter:style=Bold Baekmuk Gulim:style=Regular
If you're using xft you can essentially ignore the output from xfontsel since that will only show you the output of the old core fonts infastructure.
This bug turns out to be an issue with font caching on the system in question that it was found on. Once I ran fc-cache and reloaded the font server, all of the fonts that were not showing reappeared and are now displayed in Mozilla.
Marking invalid based on reporter comments.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.