User-Agent: Hello, this is not a browser, this is a human. Build Identifier: The GTK scrollbar thumb is off by one pixel (see screenshot) (this affects start and end in horizontal and vertical scrollbar), don't know this problem affects other widgets or not. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
Created attachment 109650 [details] screenshot showing the problem (250% zoom) forgotten to mention build ID: 2002121605 and attaching screenshot.
forgotten to the GTK theme in screenshot is the default theme.
anybody is looking into this bug?
anybody can confirm this?
Hi Reporter I've tested this with Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050302 using the modern theme The bug seems to have been resolved - Can you recheck and update the details of this bug
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.