`DOMForm.*` events fired for disconnected elements
Categories
(Toolkit :: Password Manager, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: issammani, Assigned: issammani)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [fxcm-bugs-2023])
Attachments
(9 files)
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details | Review | |
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details | Review | |
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details | Review | |
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
RyanVM
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Review |
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
RyanVM
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Review |
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
RyanVM
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Review |
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
phab-bot
:
approval-mozilla-esr115+
|
Details | Review |
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
phab-bot
:
approval-mozilla-esr115+
|
Details | Review |
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
phab-bot
:
approval-mozilla-esr115+
|
Details | Review |
Assignee | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Assignee | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•1 year ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•1 year ago
|
||
Depends on D194768
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•1 year ago
|
||
Depends on D194769
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Assignee | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 5•1 year ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/9af849c60d5f
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/62567e4688f9
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/5f697f4aa6eb
Comment 6•1 year ago
|
||
This grafts cleanly to Beta - how scary would this uplift be late in the cycle if we wanted to consider taking it in 121 for bug 1863300?
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•1 year ago
|
||
The patch refactors things a bit and mimics the old behavior just omits sending events in some cases we don't need to. Since Bug 1863300 has high visibility, I think we can uplift this now.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•1 year ago
|
||
Original Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D194768
Updated•1 year ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•1 year ago
|
||
Original Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D194769
Updated•1 year ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•1 year ago
|
||
Original Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D194770
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 11•1 year ago
|
||
Uplift Approval Request
- Steps to reproduce for manual QE testing: Try to login in https://store.playstation.com/de-de/pages/latest. It shouldn't freeze with the fix.
- Fix verified in Nightly: yes
- Is Android affected?: no
- String changes made/needed: No
- Code covered by automated testing: yes
- Explanation of risk level: The patch refactors things a bit and mimics the old behavior just omits sending events in some cases we don't need to. No additional risk is introduced.
- Needs manual QE test: no
- User impact if declined: Freezing behaviour when logging into some websites
- Risk associated with taking this patch: None
Comment 12•1 year ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9367095 [details]
Bug 1864379 - P1. Don't dispatch LoginManager DOM events for disconnected input elements. r=dimi!,emilio!
Approved for 121.0b8.
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 13•1 year ago
|
||
uplift |
Comment 14•1 year ago
|
||
Original Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D194768
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 15•1 year ago
|
||
Original Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D194769
Depends on D195780
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 16•1 year ago
|
||
Original Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D194770
Depends on D195781
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 17•1 year ago
|
||
Uplift Approval Request
- Is Android affected?: no
- String changes made/needed: None
- Fix verified in Nightly: yes
- Steps to reproduce for manual QE testing: Try to login in https://store.playstation.com/de-de/pages/latest. It shouldn't freeze with the fix.
- Risk associated with taking this patch: None
- User impact if declined: Freezing behaviour when logging into some websites
- Needs manual QE test: no
- Explanation of risk level: The patch refactors things a bit and mimics the old behavior just omits sending events in some cases we don't need to. No additional risk is introduced.
- Code covered by automated testing: yes
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 18•1 year ago
|
||
uplift |
Description
•