Can I GVE your Autograph?
Categories
(Cloud Services :: Operations: Autograph, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: csheany, Unassigned)
Details
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:124.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/124.0
Steps to reproduce:
org.mozilla.geckoview_example
See Also: Bug 1875766
Please read https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=bug-writing.html for how to write actionable bugs.
Thank you for your response.
This was filed in regard to signing the app with a single key.
|
||
Comment 4•1 year ago
|
||
a package name is not a step (to what problem?), title sounds like a pun, and a question isn't a problem summary. Can't tell if this is spam or if there's a real bug hidden in here. If this was legit please work with the folks on https://support.mozilla.org on creating well-formed, actionable bugs before re-filing.
Thank you for your respone.
The package name is of the GeckoView Example.
The title is a pun indeed :)
The bug is about installing.
|
||
Comment 6•1 year ago
|
||
csheany: You have already been asked multiple times to write actionable bugs with clear descriptions and details of how to reproduce, and given guidelines on what information to include. The bug should be understandable to anyone reading it with reasonable knowledge of the area. It should not be cryptic.
In this bug, you have not written anything about what you want doing or what the issue is. This is wasting our time. If you keep on persisting in writing bugs and comments that are not actionable/understandable we may disable your account again.
Resolving this as invalid as there's nothing clearly actionable here.
|
|
||
Updated•1 year ago
|
|
|
||
Comment 9•1 year ago
|
||
(In reply to csheany from comment #7)
The issue is mentioned in Comment 3
More information and STR are in the bug linked in Comment 1
Comment 1 is a reference to a different bug - do you mean its a duplicate of that bug, or one of the possible issues referenced in that bug? A bug should be able to stand on its own, and not need to guess at what information is needed from elsewhere. If you actually read the bug writing guidelines, then you should have realised long ago that is what we are asking for.
Comment 3 says:
This was filed in regard to signing the app with a single key.
That also doesn't say anything about which app, what key, why do we need to sign it with a particular key? The subject here also doesn't help.
(In reply to csheany from comment #8)
Would you mind reopening
Sorry, no. This is an invalid bug as it doesn't meet our guidelines for bug filing. We have already told you to respect three times in this one bug and you persist in not doing that.
|
||
Comment 10•1 year ago
|
||
- You shouldn't have to read down to comment 3 to figure out what a bug is about.
- The title is some kind of pun/joke. Don't do that, make the title as clear as possible.
- We shouldn't really have to read another linked bug to figure out what this bug means.
As far as I can tell what you want as a title is something like "Use Autograph to sign the Gecko View Example App" with some edited text based on bug 1875766 comment 0 as a description.
You should consider whether it's worth filing this bug at all though as you've been pointed towards a different solution e.g. using Firefox Focus. If you're intending to work on this bug and implement signing with Autograph then that's different of course, but if not then it looks like this bug wouldn't be worked on.
All in all I'd give up on this bug rather than reopening it as it's a bit of a mess now. Start again with a new bug if you really want but bear in mind all the above points if you do so as well as those from comment 9
|
Reporter | |
Comment 11•1 year ago
|
||
In reply to Mark Banner
Fixing this bug would fix that bug
The app is GeckoView Example
It needs a particular key to be installed successfully
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 12•1 year ago
|
||
In reply to Robert Longson
Thank you for your respone.
Anyone that uses the app would into the issue not just me.
I appreciate your advice
Description
•