Record telemetry for which Proxy types are used
Categories
(Core :: Networking: Proxy, task, P2)
Tracking
()
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox125 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: manuel, Assigned: manuel)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [necko-triaged])
Attachments
(2 files)
|
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details | Review | |
|
2.47 KB,
text/plain
|
chutten
:
data-review+
|
Details |
Helping on deciding if flipping the pref network.proxy.socks_remote_dns is feasible without introducing more complexity. See Bug 1741375.
| Assignee | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•2 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•2 years ago
|
||
Comment 3•2 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9379671 [details]
data-request.md
PRELIMINARY NOTES:
Did you know? Since your collections are Glean, you could use ./mach data-review to help with your data review request.
Also, you seem to have missed the answer to Q7. I've taken the expiry of Firefox 129 from the code.
DATA COLLECTION REVIEW RESPONSE:
Is there or will there be documentation that describes the schema for the ultimate data set available publicly, complete and accurate?
Yes.
Is there a control mechanism that allows the user to turn the data collection on and off?
Yes. This collection can be controlled through the product's preferences.
If the request is for permanent data collection, is there someone who will monitor the data over time?
No. This collection will expire in Firefox 129.
Using the category system of data types on the Mozilla wiki, what collection type of data do the requested measurements fall under?
Category 1, Technical.
Is the data collection request for default-on or default-off?
Default on for all channels.
Does the instrumentation include the addition of any new identifiers?
No.
Is the data collection covered by the existing Firefox privacy notice?
Yes.
Does the data collection use a third-party collection tool?
No.
Result: datareview+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•1 year ago
|
||
Did you know? Since your collections are Glean, you could use ./mach data-review to help with your data review request.
Thanks. I wasn't aware of that. Will use it for my next data review request.
Comment 7•1 year ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
Description
•