User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030109 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030109 Another problem with DIVS, I suppose; but this time the page also crashed. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Open http://www.tmb.net/on_soc/present.jsp?dir=MAPA*92-66*1*92-68*Cap*paradas*ESPANYA,267,118,92-66*IE*cat&idioma=cat or any other map (you can move around Barcelona's map with the arrows at the sides) Actual Results: The image of the map itself is displaced to the right. Also, I opened it in Composer to check the code again (I had opened it several times before), but it crashed. TB15990087X
The source of trouble is bit hard to describe. There is a table 2 rows, 3 columns. and map is located inside middle column, second row. This map is entered by: <div style="position:relative; left:0px; top:2px;"> <img src=../../img/maps/zoom1/102692-68.gif width="575" height="378" alt="" border="0"> <div style="position:absolute; visibility: hidden"> <img SRC="/img/flecha4.gif" alt="" border="1"> </div></div> So <td> for this cell could not be produced from map, but should be obtain from table propereties. And first row of this table have no width propereties, so it seems, that all columns have the same width.
Ruslan, could you explain what the expected rendering of the testcase you posted is?
Hard to say. I think that author think, that <TD> with <image> inside <div> should obtain his size from image. Because <img> is replaced element, so size of <div><img></div> obtained frim <img>. If there is no <div style="position:absolute"> inside first div, this table formating without overflow, let me show it. I not sure, that it is incorrect current behaviour.
Created attachment 111135 [details] reduced testcase with linux trunk 20030109: on initial or shift-reload, the page is initially ok, but when the size of the second image is known (hidden in the original URL), the two images shift over to the right. reload fixes it (images shift back to the left, inside the table)
So in structure, such as <td> <div style="position:relative"><img><div></div></div> </td> Size of TD calculated as intricint size of image, but for <td> <div style="position:relative"><img><div style="position:absolute"></div></div> </td> size of <td> become independent of image size.
regression between linux trunk builds 2002092221 and 2002092408, implicating bug 75121
Keywords: regression, testcase
The URL is 404. The testcases works for me in Firefox 2 and Minefield on Linux. Can anyone still reproduce this bug?
worksforme since Mozilla 1.6
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.