Closed Bug 190993 Opened 22 years ago Closed 22 years ago

[classic] cache pref panel is "squished"

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: Preferences, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED FIXED

People

(Reporter: darin.moz, Assigned: skasinathan)

References

Details

(Keywords: regression)

Attachments

(2 files)

build id: 2003-01-28 linux trunk... attaching screenshot of cache pref panel.
Attached image screenshot
->shliang, who last worked on this.

fwiw, it looks fine for me, but i'm using the modern theme. will check classic
in a bit (unless you're using a 3rd party theme).
Assignee: suresh → shliang
Severity: normal → enhancement
back to me. I did some work in this cache pref panel. Also, I tested this on my
linux before I checked in. 
Assignee: shliang → suresh
ah, didn't realize that. suresh, when did you checkin your change that might've
affected this?
sairuh, my checkin went into the tree yesterday (1-27-03). 
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
classic theme.
Also on Win2k. I took the liberty to change the bug accordingly...
OS: Linux → All
Hardware: PC → All
Summary: cache pref panel is "squished" under linux → cache pref panel is "squished"
Severity: enhancement → normal
Summary: cache pref panel is "squished" → [classic] cache pref panel is "squished"
WFM with current CVS trunk on WinXP and classic theme.  I did notice though that
Darin has a larger font trying to fit into an identically sized panel.
i still see the problem with a trunk linux/rh8 CVS build from this morning. 
(note: my trunk CVS build has XFT enabled).
I can duplicate this in my debug build (classic theme) and using today's release
build on win2k. Patch on its way..
Attached patch patch.Splinter Review
Attachment #112908 - Flags: superreview?(jaggernaut)
Attachment #112908 - Flags: review?(shliang)
highly visible regression and easy fix ?
Flags: blocking1.3b?
Comment on attachment 112908 [details] [diff] [review]
patch.

sr=jag
Attachment #112908 - Flags: superreview?(jaggernaut) → superreview+
Attachment #112908 - Flags: review?(shliang) → review+
Flags: blocking1.3b? → blocking1.3b-
*** Bug 191282 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
As per attachment 113096 [details] [diff] [review] you might want to remove the flex="1" on the other hbox
in case it also causes further problems down the line.
*** Bug 191305 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Ok, this does not block 1.3b.
But now that this has r= and sr= and already two duplicates during its three
days of existance, is there a reason why nobody seeks approval for the patch?
Suresh? Or may I?

This regression is very visible and the fix is a one-liner...
Attachment #112908 - Flags: approval1.3b?
Attachment #112908 - Flags: approval1.3b? → approval1.3b+
fixed in trunk.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
*** Bug 191561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
vrfy'd fixed with 2003.02.10 comm trunk bits on win2k and linux rh8.0.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: