Open Bug 194262 Opened 22 years ago Updated 2 years ago

Collation differences across platforms

Categories

(MailNews Core :: Internationalization, defect)

x86
Windows 2000
defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

People

(Reporter: carosendahl, Unassigned)

Details

(Keywords: topembed-, Whiteboard: edt_x3)

The ordering of messages in the message list by Subject is different in Win98, than it is with WinXP and AOL Mail. Example of message list ordering by Subject in Win98: TESTING #100 TESTING #10 TESTING #11 TESTING #1 While, the message list ordering by Subject in WinXP and AOL Mail is: TESTING #1 TESTING #10 TESTING #100 TESTING #11 Steps to reproduce: 1) Send email with Subjects to show how messages will be ordered. For example, using the above four lines as subjects in four emails. 2) View the mailbox with ordering on a Windows 98 machine with Subject selected in decending mode. 3) Then, view the same mailbox on an Windows XP, or AOL Mail, again with the Subject selected in descending mode. 4) The ordering of the messages will be different. Expected behavior: Subject ordering should be consistent across all O.S.'s and apps. Observed behavior: Win98 displays the Subject ordering differently than WinXP and AOL Mail. Windows XP: Machine: Dell Latitude Windows 98 SE: Machine: HP Kayak XAs
Whiteboard: edt_x3
Keywords: topembed
brade -- can you comment on your topembed nomination?
Component: Mail Window Front End → Internationalization
QA Contact: esther → carosendahl
Summary: The ordering of messages in the message list by Subject is different in Win98, → Collation differences across platforms
Frank, should this be your bug?
Assignee: sspitzer → ftang
minusing topembed after conversation w/ frank.
Keywords: topembedtopembed-
Product: MailNews → Core
what a hack. I have not touch mozilla code for 2 years. I didn't read these bugs for 2 years. And they are still there. Just close them as won't fix to clean up.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Mass Bug Re-Open of bugs Frank Tang Closed with no good reason. Spam is his fault not my own
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WONTFIX → ---
Mass Re-assinging Frank Tangs old bugs that he closed won't fix and had to be re-open. Spam is his fault not my own
Assignee: ftang → nobody
Status: REOPENED → NEW
Product: Core → MailNews Core
QA Contact: carosendahl → i18n
Still repro. The correct order should be this based on filename sorting: TESTING #1 TESTING #10 TESTING #11 TESTING #100 Thunderbird 52.1.1 (32-bit) Windows 7 64-bit
Severity: minor → S4
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.