User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030212 Debian/1.2.1-9woody1 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030212 Debian/1.2.1-9woody1 i'm using ion as windowmanager. now it happened, that the context menu exceeded the mozilla window, so i was able to leave the mozilla window without it closing the context menu. I resized the window, mozilla still had the keyboard focus. I closed the context menu by hitting an item. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual Results: till the next window resize, mozilla didn't use it's new space. Expected Results: mozilla should close context menue if he loses window focus.
Is this still a problem with recent builds (1.7 or 1.8b1)? Please also try a build from .mozilla.org (instead of just the debian one)
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.