Closed
Bug 207805
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Back Button -- Missing data
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Bugzilla-General, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: mike_brown, Assigned: justdave)
References
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030313 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030313 I was filling in a bug report and had written a fairly large amount of information, including some quite witty remarks (ahem) I clicked submit and got a message saying I'd skipped the summary field and to click BACK I di so and found all the data had disappeared, requiring me to reenter it all (minus the witticisms) Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Fill the form without a field, sumbit, click BACK and reenter everything. Actual Results: Data not retained Expected Results: Data should be retained
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
This is a browser bug, although I don't know of any bug in 1.3 which caused this.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
This was originally bug 163714 for Mozilla, but it was supposedly fixed 6 months ago, and if it's been this long since it was fixed I'd suggest filing a new bug (or moving this one to the Browser product) if you can reproduce this at will in a current build. The "workaround" for this for Bugzilla is bug 36843.
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 208415 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 208629 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
Other possible (already fixed) Mozilla bugs: bug 179020, bug 179330 If anyone knows a currently-open Mozilla bug for this, please post it here.
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
I can confirm this bug burns me all the time in IE 6.0.26 on Windows XP, and bugzilla 2.16.2.
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
I can confirm too that this burns me all the time on Internet Explorer 6.0.2800 on Windows 2000 - it is definitely not a Mozilla-only problem. I have observed that with the default cache setting in IE (Tools | Internet Options... | Connections | General | Temporary Internet Files | Settings... | Check for newer versions of stored pages | Automatically), the form values are kept if I hit the Back button within a few minutes of loading the form, but they are lost if it has been longer than that. Of course that generally correlates with when I've spent more time filling out the form and looking up related information, which is infuriating! Turning the cache setting to "Check for newer versions of stored pages | Never" causes the form values to be preserved no matter how old the page is, but that in turn causes a whole host of other problems with various web applications. This is a dataloss problem and hence should be upgraded to critical with the dataloss keyword (as well as CONFIRMED). If this is a bug in Internet Explorer, then please report it to Microsoft, or else give me evidence so that I can report it to them. Thanks for your help. Bugzilla is a great product and this pretty much the only thing that really, really bugs me about it (sorry, no pun intended ;).
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
FYI, here an article from Microsoft about the behavior in IE: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;174550 Also, http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;199805 SYMPTOMS If you fill out a form on a Web page, submit the form, and then click Back in Internet Explorer, the form may not be repopulated with the data you just entered. CAUSE The form is repopulated only if the following items are true: - The Web page is not an HTTPS (or secure) Web page. - The page is cached to disk. - The page has not changed since you filled out the form. STATUS This behavior is by design. By the way, I'd be happy if bug 36843 was implemented, but it is marked as an enhancement, and I still consider this to be a dataloss/critical bug.
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #8) > FYI, here an article from Microsoft about the behavior in IE: > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;174550 > Also, http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;199805 > With respect, what's all this talk about IE? The original post was about Mozilla and, in particular, a problem with bugzilla forms. If your comments about how the web site is designed being a contributing factor are correct, then we should focus on how the bugzilla process is to be changed to prevent the problem -- yes??
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
#@! - This just burned me again! (mistyped someone's email address on the CC: list) (In reply to comment #9) > With respect, what's all this talk about IE? The original post was about > Mozilla and, in particular, a problem with bugzilla forms. If your comments > about how the web site is designed being a contributing factor are correct, then > we should focus on how the bugzilla process is to be changed to prevent the > problem -- yes?? I agree with you that this is about a problem with bugzilla forms, and that we should focus on how the bugzilla process is to be changed to prevent the problem. I am just trying to point out that: (1) This is not a Mozilla-specific problem. Most of the discussion here and in other bugs seems to imply that it is, and that fixing Mozilla would fix this problem. That's why I was describing the behavior in IE, and how it is affected by the cache settings (e.g. in the off chance that this could be fixed with HTML cache directives). I was also trying to illustrate how I have exhausted the workarounds that I can think of in IE. (2) I consider this to be a critical/dataloss bug, and either it or bug 36843 (which sounds like a great solution, but is currently classified as a relatively low-priority enhancement) should accordingly be upgraded to critical.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
There is nothing we can do from the client side to prevent this except to implement bug 36843, so marking this as a dupe of that. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 36843 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Updated•12 years ago
|
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•