211154 - ggd.nl - gives only half to non-IE users (bad browser checking, etc.)

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Tech Evangelism Graveyard :: Dutch, defect, P2)

Description

[Marcel van Beurden]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

The site redirects IE-users to http://www.ggd.nl/index_i.htm and others stay at
http://www.ggd.nl/index3.htm. The IE-version shows pop-up menus and hover effect
and contains more pages than the non-IE version.
Visiting the IE-version with Mozilla gives errors due to bad DOM scripting. 
For example:
Error: inhoudfull is not defined
Source File: http://www.ggd.nl/index_i.htm
Line: 58


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to http://www.ggd.nl
2. IE gives a popup menu on the left side.
3. Mozilla does not give a pop-up menu.

Actual Results:  
No pop-up menu, hence no access to certain pages.

Expected Results:  
Show a working pop-up menu.

Webmaster according to meta tags:
M.J. van Keulen <[e-mail]>

Comment 1

[Reinout van Schouwen]

Confirming.

Comment 2

[Patrick]

feedback can be given at [e-mail]

Comment 3

[Marcel van Beurden]

This website has been completely changed since I reported the bug. But it still
uses things like document.layers and document.all for the DHTML menu. So Gecko
browsers still miss out of some features...

See:
http://www.ggd.nl/kennisnet/js/layers.js

Comment 4

[Cyrille VIVION]

[bug248549notfixed]

Comment 5

[Patrick]

bug still there.
Reporter, perhaps you want to contact the web master?
You can find an example letter at
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/tech-evangelism/site/tech-letter-nl.html

Comment 6

[Felix Miata]

Conforming summary to TFM item 10 at 
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/tech-evangelism/site/procedures.html#file-new

Comment 7

[Patrick]

Seems to be fixed now. I have no IE lying around. Can someone run a quick comparison of the site in Gecko and IE?

Comment 8

[u81239]

I tried IE7 (I don’t have 6 atm), and it looks a little better in IE, small CSS stuff. Looks like it wasn’t tested in other browsers than IE. But functionality-wise it seems to be the same, don’t see missing pop-ups and hover effects, nor the URLs mentioned in the OP.

Of course I only looked quickly, and only with IE7 as reference.


~Grauw

Comment 9

[Patrick]

(In reply to comment #8)
> I tried IE7 (I don’t have 6 atm), and it looks a little better in IE, small
> CSS stuff. Looks like it wasn’t tested in other browsers than IE. But
> functionality-wise it seems to be the same, don’t see missing pop-ups and
> hover effects, nor the URLs mentioned in the OP.
> 
> Of course I only looked quickly, and only with IE7 as reference.


Since we received no further comments, i'm resolving this as fixed based on comment 8