Closed
Bug 212678
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
New variable in "newchangedmail": %re%
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Email Notifications, enhancement, P4)
Bugzilla
Email Notifications
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: Bugzilla-Mozilla, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
1.86 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0)
Build Identifier:
I wanted to add a variable that would be similar to %neworchanged%, but it
would report "Re:" if it's NOT new and nothing if it is new. This way, the e-
mail messages would show up correctly in a mailing list or message thread.
The amount of code require to make this change is maybe 5 lines, and I could do
it easily, but I just wanted some input on whether it was better to not add
extra **** into the scripts, or go ahead and add the variable to the
processmail and defparams.pl scripts.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
I wouldn't bother worrying about this until bug 84876 lands.
When it does, the proper way to do this is to handle it in the email template;
pass along the current "isnew" flag, and let the template decide what to do
about it.
Having said that, I don't think a new Param is necessarily warranted (or even
wanted); there was some discussion on IRC about combining a "enable mail
threading" param that would turn on a feature like this as well as whatever bug
31314 turns out to be when it goes in.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Priority: -- → P4
Hardware: PC → All
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
Attached the patch if anybody wants it...
Bug 31314 looks like something I could fix in 5 minutes (I'm familar with
In-Reply-To very well...), but I'll have to take a look at it. (Like you
implied, bug subjects can be deceiving.)
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Kick all my Bugzilla bugs back to the component default owner.
Assignee: preed → email-notifications
Updated•19 years ago
|
QA Contact: mattyt-bugzilla → default-qa
![]() |
||
Comment 4•14 years ago
|
||
The newchangedmail parameter is gone.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•