User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030516 Mozilla Firebird/0.6 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030516 Mozilla Firebird/0.6 Any of the catalogue pages at http://www.7dayshop.com cause a huge amount of processor use (96%+), viewing with either Mozilla 1.4 or Firebird 0.6 on a PIII-1Ghz with 512MB RAM, WinXP. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to http://www.7dayshop.com 2. Wait for the page to redirect into the catalogue 3. Try browsing the catalogue and note the CPU usage Actual Results: CPU use near 100% Expected Results: Much less CPU use
Confirming using trunk build 2003071204 on winxp pro sp1, 1.1ghz, 512ram Having 100% cpu usage without doing anything.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Confirming trunk 2003-07-14-08, Win2k, Athlon 500, ATI Rage 128 GL AGP, 384 MB RAM. I see 93-100% CPU usage if the URL is the main tab and the images are allowed to loop as many times as they like.
I get "only" 20-35% CPU with an Athlon 2600+. Time to upgrade your CPU :-)
Im using win2k, using 200307128 and I get no CPU utilization past about 5%
I get about 90% on Linux, with 80% in X and 10% in Firebird. 20030516 on Slackware 9, PIII 1.13GHz.
OS: Windows XP → All
Created attachment 127848 [details] testcase I have no idea what this thing is, but it's there if the <link> tag's there (in IE too). The more text in the document, the higher the processor usage. If you put the code from the stylesheet instead of <link>, it's gone.
Hmm under my home machine (Firebird 20030630, WinXP, Dual Athlon XP 1700+, 1GB RAM, Radeon 9800), there is only about 20% utilization, with most of it as Kernel time according to taskmgr. That test case doesn't really case the issue though, just the original webpage.
I realize that the testcase doesn't take up the processor. But I found "loading" thingy very odd, so I figure it's the cause. As I said, as I cut down on text in the file, processor usage got less. There wasn't anything in particular that caused it.
Looks like almost all the time is spent in painting, due to the animated gifs on the page....
Created attachment 128354 [details] testcase Still very high processor use with very little left in the file.
I have no problem with that testcase either.
*** Bug 217516 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Processor use depends on window size. O_o Appears to be the case with both testcases, too, though on a smaller scale.
I still get the problem when going o 7dayshop, of 88% processor X, and 4% on firebird. This is running firebird 0.7, athlon XP3000 on redhat 9
I still see no problem with the testcases or URL in this bug. Can the people who saw the problem before test again?
OK - I can't test with the same machine or same version of firefox (or firebird) right now because that machine doesn't currently have a monitor attached; I've tested remotely over the network - but that's not really a fair test. Having said all that: The site no longer seems to chew up loads of processor time, using either Firefox 1.0PR or Firebird 0.6 over the network from the old machine. Interestingly, 7dayshop seem to have removed the loading graphic (which seems to have been done as a background graphic that gets covered by the page contents, if that's a useful clue!). The second testcase referenced the loading.gif file from the 7dayshop.com website, and this file seems to have been replaced with a single-pixel static gif.
do you still see this? WFM Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1b4pre) Gecko/20090313 Shiretoko/3.1b4pre
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.