Closed
Bug 213139
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Firefox keywords page isn't written yet
Categories
(www.mozilla.org :: General, defect)
www.mozilla.org
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: jay, Assigned: danielwang)
References
()
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030625 Mozilla Firebird/0.6 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030625 Mozilla Firebird/0.6 Server Error This server has encountered an internal error which prevents it from fulfilling your request. The most likely cause is a misconfiguration. Please ask the administrator to look for messages in the server's error log. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
According to bonsai, that page no longer exists. I would imagine there is actually some configuration error causing the message you're getting rather than a 404, but since the page isn't supposed to exist anyway I'm not too worried. Where are you linking to it from? Everything under /phoenix/ got moved to /firebird/. The link you followed to it needs to be fixed.
The link is on http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firebird/why/, under "Find Stuff Easier."
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
OK, the link on the Firebird "why" page has bee updated to point at firebird instead of phoenix (updating URL) but it still gets a Server Error. And Bonsai still says the new URL doesn't exist. Ben?
Assignee: endico → ben
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 216200 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
Why isn't this being fixed? It's a link from the page that we use to bring users to Firebird--it seems like this would be a turn-off for them.
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
This is a server problem. There's another .shtml file I know of that doesn't work. Does the server allow .shtml?
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
The new servers were physically moved to their new home at the Mozilla Foundation's colo host today. Everything will probably be moved to the new server at some point over the next two weeks. The new server is Apache rather than Netscape Enterprise Server, so some things like this that are broken I suspect will magickly fix themselves :)
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 213680 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 219133 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
dave: it's been over two weeks. is there a new ETA for when the necessary bits and pieces will be moved over to the new server? if it isn't soon, perhaps http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firebird/why/ should be updated. it's pretty cheesy that the page that is supposed to convince you to try out a new browser has had a broken link for almost two months! :(
Comment 11•21 years ago
|
||
The new webserver has a bad hard drive. Compaq will be out to replace it on Monday. Once that drive is replaced, the move from the old server should happen shortly thereafter (probably another week yet, it's waiting on mail services and so forth, too). Dawn tells me Ben plans to check in a new keywords.shtml anyway that should hopefully fix the problem no matter which server it's on very shortly.
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 219393 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13•21 years ago
|
||
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firebird/why/ has moved to http://www.mozilla.org/products/firebird/why/ , but it still links to http://www.mozilla.org/products/firebird/keywords/keywords.shtml that URL no longer gives the server error, but now you get an ugly 404 page. this is a prominent bad link. dave? do you know what the latest status is? marc
Comment 14•21 years ago
|
||
Nope. Server is now spitting out the correct error, which is the only part of this I was involved in. Someone with responsibility for the page content on that part of the site needs to pick up the ball now (Ben?)
Comment 15•21 years ago
|
||
who is ben? is he on the cc: list for this bug?
Comment 16•21 years ago
|
||
He's the owner of the bug.
Comment 17•21 years ago
|
||
ben didn't reply to a personal email sent 9/27 :( the link on http://mozilla.org/products/firebird/why/ has been updated to http://mozilla.org/products/firebird/why/keywords.html this page just says "I have not written this page yet." this is better than before, but still pretty cheesy. why don't we just remove the following text until the pages are ready? == A full list of Mozilla Firebird's supported Smart Keywords is available here, and if they aren't enough for you you can make your own!. ==
Comment 18•21 years ago
|
||
updating summary - no server errors now, but the page still needs to be written.
Severity: minor → normal
OS: Linux → All
Summary: Server error → Firebird keywords page isn't written yet
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
QA Contact: imajes → stolenclover
Updated•21 years ago
|
Summary: Firebird keywords page isn't written yet → Firefox keywords page isn't written yet
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Assignee: bugs → stolenclover
QA Contact: stolenclover → michaell+bmo
Comment 19•21 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 234092 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 20•21 years ago
|
||
Anybody have an objection to changing the link from the why page to <http://www.mozilla.org/docs/end-user/keywords.html>, at least temporarily?
Comment 21•21 years ago
|
||
Temporarily probably would work fine. If anyone can hook me up with access to that page's code that's not part of the overall template, I'll try to port that document from Mozilla to Firefox, as I'm pretty sure the dmoz keyword isn't in Firefox (I wouldn't know as I've gotten in the habit of erasing all default bookmarks and importing my own).
Comment 22•21 years ago
|
||
Jeff - you don't need any special access to see the code without the template. If you just click the "edit this page" link at the bottom, it will take you into "Doctor" and you can see, and edit, the source there. You won't be able to commit any changes, but if you attach a modified version to this bug, that can be reviewed (I guess Ben should review it) and then put on to the site.
Comment 23•20 years ago
|
||
Well, so much for me ever getting around to doing this. This bug is likely INVALID now per bug 245083 comment 2.
Comment 24•20 years ago
|
||
daniel: do you agree with this being invalid? in any case, shouldn't this go to Firefox component?
Updated•20 years ago
|
Component: webmaster@mozilla.org → Web Site
Product: mozilla.org → Firefox
Version: other → unspecified
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Assignee | ||
Comment 25•20 years ago
|
||
> daniel: do you agree with this being invalid? maybe. We need to really obsolete products/firefox/why/ though (bug 260109)
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Comment 26•18 years ago
|
||
--> Websites :: www.mozilla.com so timeless can close out Firefox :: Product Site.
Component: Product Site → www.mozilla.com
Product: Firefox → Websites
Updated•16 years ago
|
QA Contact: michaell+bmo → www-mozilla-com
Updated•12 years ago
|
Component: www.mozilla.org/firefox → www.mozilla.org
Updated•12 years ago
|
Component: www.mozilla.org → General
Product: Websites → www.mozilla.org
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•