Marketing site and sub-projects tracking bug

NEW
Assigned to

Status

--
enhancement
16 years ago
11 years ago

People

(Reporter: raccettura, Assigned: bart)

Tracking

({meta})

Details

(Reporter)

Description

16 years ago
User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

We have several bugs at this point, that should all be part of the soon to be
marketing.mozilla.org website.  I think we should discuss how they can all be
included into the marketing site, but left separate enough, not to be
overwhelming to the user.

It's an all out war.  Tanks, Planes, AND bombs are going to be needed.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
(Reporter)

Comment 1

16 years ago
To get the ball rolling:

I think marketing.mozlla.org should really be a hub for several sites:

marketing.mozilla.org/personal
for those who want it for themselves "switch campaign"

marketing.mozilla.org/oem
for computer manufacturers/OS developers/other OEM distribution methods

marketing.mozilla.org/business
businesses wishing to deploy Mozilla browser in their organization


Each site should contain relevent *targetted* information on:
Why to switch
How to switch
Tools/articles/informative information
How to get help
Case studies (from those who have been down the road)


marketing.mozilla.org/affiliate
for the new "affiliate program".  

As per discussions in that bug.




By doing this, we will hit all markets, and target everyone, with personalized
information.  Individuals/Businesses/OEM have different needs, concerns, etc...
we need to deal with them on their own.  


Depends on: 213415, 213948

Updated

16 years ago
Depends on: 213898

Comment 2

16 years ago
Is this to be the official tracking bug for the marketing effort?
If so, can it gain a meta keyword, full dependancies and a note
to the effect? Thanks, Nigel.

Updated

16 years ago
Blocks: 94490
Keywords: meta

Comment 3

16 years ago
I think the marketing subdomain may be useful for internal purposes, but I don't
think end users will feel comfortable to be openly told they are being "marketed".

I can't recall any other marketing effort in which the word is openly displayed.

I wouldn't suggest a new subdomain, instead use the available mozilla.com domain
as has already being suggested for all end user purposes, from here on:

store.mozilla.com
www.mozilla.com/switch
mdn.mozilla.com (Mozilla Developers Network)
www.mozilla.com/enterprise  ans so on.

In brief, constrain the mozilla.org to what it has served until now:
development. Mozilla development, not development with Mozilla platform.

marketing.mozilla.org is best suited for internal marketing projects, pilots,
and so on, nothing going heavily outside or promoted. marketing.mozilla.org
can't be Mozilla's face to the public, because of the name.

Comment 4

16 years ago
I support hiding marketing.mozilla.org from public view.
Marketing is an organisational activity that is not revealed in
any commercial or non-commercial organisation.

It is the output of the marketing activity that must be placed
in the public view; just as code changes are placed in the
public view after a hacking session.

We do, however, need a community area where collaboration
can occur.

Can I also remark that the central activity of marketting
is: "To meet user needs successfully".  Any marketing activity
should start with an analysis of what those needs are.

Therefore, is there a need for a market research plan first
and foremost?  That is effectively a design document and an
action plan. If the target audience is not consulted before
processes are put in place, then no real marketting is
underway. Not all business/organisation development is
marketing.

Can Bart advise if there is a master plan at this point,
and if any target audiences has yet been consulted?  The
community can help with surveys, fact finding, etc. We can
also assisting with the fleshing out of that plan. Is the
plan "open".

Also this bug blocks bug 94490, which a) is not a meta bug
and b) is a PR bug. In the usual case, PR is an output of
marketing analysis, not the other way around. You can't decide
what to say until you know who has needs that require statements
to be made.
(Reporter)

Comment 5

16 years ago
I think Comment #3 hits my personal feelings right on the head.  It shouldn't be
called "marketing" when it goes production.  Simply because it's bad PR mojo. 
Perhaps the following architecture:

http://www.mozilla.org    -  Central hub, easy to remember... consumer oriented
http://get.mozilla.org    -  Below central hub... consumer oriented, consumer
version of the /releases page.  Archive of all versions, information on /why to
/switch listing /advantages (subdirectories with '/').

http://affiliate.mozilla.org     -  Affiliate Program

http://deploy.mozilla.org     -  For OEM/Commercial deployment.  Mozilla
Customization Kit, documentation, case studies, all sorts of goodies

CC -->  Bart

Can we do this instead?  I think it would be much better in the long run.  Call
it marketing.mozilla.org for the sake of keeping it "together".  Perhaps even
keep marketing.mozilla.org as a  website for tracking mozilla usage, from a
"mozilla community" perspective.  But keep the above for the general public.  

Less intrusive sounding, friendly, and easier to navigate.

Comment 6

16 years ago
I'll add my 2 cents, as an ex-netscape employee and technology evangelist from
'96 to '98.

0) The goal should be to promote Mozilla. But what does that mean?

   It means getting people and organizations to support mozilla.org's
   continued existance and using it's products.

   So the priorities and messages should fall into some sort of hierachy
   for priority on communicating concepts, something like this:

   1) Mozilla Firebird and Thunderbird
   2) Mozilla.org
   3) All other Mozilla technologies
   4) Mozilla community

  There needs to be a document on this, so everyone can reference it, debate it,
  and line up against it for alignment and measure of efforts.

1) KISS - keep it simple, stupid.
  Always promote mozilla.org/AREA and create an AREA.mozilla.org alias for
  those who can't remember. Limit the AREA namespace to be as small and
  concentrated for a marketing initiative or an audience as possible and
  to prevent fragmentation of efforts.

  Perhaps those four items listed above suggests the AREAs needed?

  Recycle each AREA with new events/promotions/content so that you can keep
  the old marketing customers interested who have already been part of a
  campaign. "Overload" each area.

2) Make marketing.mozilla.org for marketing coordination and documentation,
  but not an end-user area at all.

  Make it a launch pad. I'd rather land on that home page to get  up to date
  (top down organization of efforts) and point me into detail
  newsgroups and bugzilla, rather than slogging (bottom up) through bugzilla
  and newsgroups first.

3) The purpose of marketing is to support sales. :~)
  I'll quote Jim Barksdale on this, "we are in the business of creating
  and keeping customers."

  So we want people to get the Mozilla product and use it. Every download
  is a sale. Every continued day of usage is a sale. Every improvement in
  the browser and community is a sale for mozilla.org as a whole.

  Allow multi-level-marketing switch campaign. Allow people to post up
  testimonies so anyone can see the case being built by people, not marketing
  types.

  Allow people to email their own testimonies to friends:

  "Dear Friend, I switched to the Mozilla Browser and in two weeks, I could
   suft the web faster, block spam in my email, and stop those annoying pop
   up ads -- FOR FREE!

   Want to try it out? Go to this link and download the latest Mozilla browser.

   Signed, your pal."

4) Increase access to information.

   Some of this may already be done, but it needs to be communicated and
   linked together better 'cause I'm not aware of it.

   1) Make the newsgroups mirror to a mailing list (and vice versa)?
      I betcha a lot of people don't regularly look at newsgroups anymore.
      I can say I used to read Usenet everyday, but I haven't done so for
      years and that has become a habit.
   2) Add a web based interface to the newsgroups.

   Now people can choose their preferred way to get and contribute to the same
   information, regardless of method (news:, http:, mail:).

End brain dump for now. Sorry if this is a rant or unhelpful or needs to be
divided up into separate bugs/issues -- it's a communication that I hope helps.

Comment 7

16 years ago
There was some recent (May 2003) discussion that may be relevant to this bug in
netscape.public.mozilla.general :
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=3EBF18C3.7000705%40bclary.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dnetscape.public.mozilla%2Btech%2Bevangelism%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D3EBF18C3.7000705%2540bclary.com%26rnum%3D1

Some other relevant issues that spring to mind:
Using mozilla.com as an end user site is probably one excellent way of
organising the mozilla web content. This could then be subdomained for specific
groups of people - like press.mozilla.com, business.mozilla.com. Alternativly,
simple directories could be used - mozilla.com/business and so on. This would
allow mozilla.org itslef to remain virtually unchanged, which would be excellent
from a 'cool uri's' point of view. However, it would, initially at least, make
the end user site less visible than the development site.

The reverse possibility is to shift all the developer oriented content to its
own subdomain like dev.mozilla.org and place all the new end user oriented
content at mozilla.org (+ appropriate subdirectories). The big advantage of this
approach is that the mozilla.org domain is already well known as the home of
mozilla. The big disadvantage is, of course, that bookmarks and links pointing
to specific documents will break. 

In either case, a clear seperation is needed between developer content and
end-user content - much more so than exists at the moment. This means, for
example, that end user sites shouldn't be full of links to bugzilla - people
complain about bugspam enough as it is without every new user who has had
Mozilla 'marketed' to them posting irrelevant comments on bugs. Additionally, it
should be /easier/ to find the end-user content than the developer content. This
means that hiding end-user content in a subdomain is probably a bad idea.

Comment 8

16 years ago
Bart said in marketing-public before that the lawyer advised against having a
separate mozilla.com

We should separate user info from developer info. But until we get more people
involved in user documentation, this is wishful thinking (so far I count only
~10 active user doc contributors: Neil Marshall, RJ Keller, Brian Heinrich, me,
Asa, Ben Goodger, David Tenser, Timeless, kovu, Robert Mohr)

> This means, for example, that end user sites shouldn't be full of links to
> bugzilla - people complain about bugspam enough as it is without every new
> user who has had Mozilla 'marketed' to them posting irrelevant comments on
> bugs.

I concur with James Graham. I think we should selectively comment out bug links
in the release notes. Some bugs are WONTFIX, INVALID, or WORKSFORME becuase they
are not really Mozilla problems and they confuse people. Will someone file a bug
on this?

Updated

16 years ago
Depends on: 223359
Summary: marketing.mozilla.org → Marketing site and sub-projects tracking bug

Comment 9

11 years ago
<rant>
Good grief!  What in the world does the word "marketing" mean in the USA?  "The job of marketing is to support sales"??

Marketing is a business philosophy that hold that the One True Road to sustainable profit is customer focus, i.e. serving customer needs at a profit.

The very idea that marketing should be a secret activity carried out behind closed doors is a damning indictment on ... well, something.

We develop code to produce software that helps people, and protects the Web.  We do that in the open.  Why on Earth shouldn't we develop code (marketing plans) that deliver that help to the unliberated in the open also?

If your marketing plans have to be secret you really should be ashamed of yourself.  You must be planning to trick or deceive people in some way.  Shame on you.

If by "marketing" you mean "find out what people want, and give it to them ---  in a way that benefits us as well" you will find life much more satisfying.

If we have marketing.mozilla.com as the paradigm of Open Source Marketing or Open Source Business (dealing with the customer transparently, openly and _honestly_ : imagine that!) then you will see the true power of the Free Software message, my young padawans.
</rant>

OK, I feel much better now.  

Srsly, I can haz mrktng job @ mozilla? Oh noes! I wont get payez.  

Want to know what your customers think?  

http://wiki.mozilla.org/Mozilla_Community_Surveys

OK, it's not much, but at least it's a start.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.