Closed
Bug 214397
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
need certutil batch mode
Categories
(NSS :: Tools, defect, P2)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
3.9
People
(Reporter: julien.pierre, Assigned: wtc)
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 3 obsolete files)
|
8.90 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
|
9.23 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
In order to create complex test cases that simulate application environment, I
find it necessary to be able to perform batch commands in certutil within a
single process. Using an external shell to call certutil multiple times doesn't
do the trick, because the NSS cache and many other structures go away.
I propose to add a -B option - for batch mode. It will take the name of a file
as an argument. Each line in that file will be the equivalent of a current
certutil command-line.
The expectation is that NSS will be initialized the first time certutil runs,
ie. before the commands in the batch file are run.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 128834 [details] [diff] [review]
add -B option for batch mode
Nelson, Wan-Teh, please review. Thanks.
Attachment #128834 -
Flags: superreview?(kpc)
Attachment #128834 -
Flags: review?(nelsonb)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 128834 [details] [diff] [review]
add -B option for batch mode
Nelson, Wan-Teh, please review. Thanks.
Attachment #128834 -
Flags: superreview?(wtc)
| Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #128834 -
Flags: superreview?(kpc)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
Nelson, Wan-Teh,
Could you please review the patch for this bug ?
Thanks.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 128834 [details] [diff] [review]
add -B option for batch mode
Julien, I wrote my review comments on a copy of this patch
and left it in your cube.
I think the use of recursion is a clever way to process
the command file in batch mode!
Please add some comments to describe how the command file
will be processed in batch mode. Something like this:
- If -B <command line> is specified, the contents in the
command file will be interpreted as subsequent certutil
commands to be executed in the current certutil process
context after the current certutil command has been executed.
- Each line in the command file consists of the command
line argumentss for certutil.
- The -d <configdir> option must not be specified in the
command file. (Any other command line options disallowed
in the command file?)
- Quoting with double quote characters ("...") is supported
to allow white space in a command line argument. The
double quote character cannot be escaped and quoting cannot
be nested in this version.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
Attachment #128834 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Reporter | ||
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
Attachment #130146 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #130148 -
Flags: review?(wtc)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 130148 [details] [diff] [review]
another update
1. After the while loop that skips white space,
we must check for the case that *space == '\0'.
If we do not handle that case, the subsequent
strchr(space+1, '\"') call will read beyond the
end of string, and we will add an extraneous
empty string to the newargv array.
2. If invalid is PR_TRUE, we should not go on
to execute the next command. We should exit
the while loop.
3. We should get the return value of the
certutil_main(..., PR_FALSE) call. If the
return value is nonzero (a failure), we should
exit the while loop and exit the process with
that return value. In other words, if a command
fails, we should not go on to execute the next
command.
Two suggested style changes:
1. Use the prevalent multi-line comment block
style.
2. In the NSS source tree we usually use the
PORT_ versions of malloc, realloc, free, strpbrk,
strchr, strdup, and strrchr.
Attachment #130148 -
Flags: review?(wtc) → review-
| Reporter | ||
Comment 9•22 years ago
|
||
I have addressed all issues in this patch except the first one you mention
about reading past the string. I don't believe that can happen since the
strchr(space+1, ... is only invoked in the case where *space matches the quote
, which means it is not the end of the string.
| Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #130148 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #130868 -
Flags: superreview?(nelsonb)
Attachment #130868 -
Flags: review?(wchang0222)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
Checking in certutil.c;
/cvsroot/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/certutil/certutil.c,v <-- certutil.c
new revision: 1.77; previous revision: 1.76
done
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
| Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #130868 -
Flags: superreview?(MisterSSL)
Attachment #130868 -
Flags: review?(wchang0222)
| Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #128834 -
Flags: superreview?(wchang0222)
Attachment #128834 -
Flags: review?(MisterSSL)
| Reporter | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P2
Target Milestone: --- → 3.9
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•