Closed Bug 214766 Opened 21 years ago Closed 19 years ago

Mechanism for entering email addresses (to, cc, bcc) is awkward

Categories

(Thunderbird :: Message Compose Window, enhancement)

enhancement
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 252665

People

(Reporter: richcowan, Assigned: mscott)

Details

User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0) Build Identifier: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.1 Many users, particularly novices and older people, are going to likely have trouble with the size of the font for the "to" line. I think that it is kind of wierd that a large amount of screen space is allocated to the from line (something you normally don't want to change), but a much smaller space is allocated to the "to" line, which in some cases will contain a large number of email addresses. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. click on compose 2. 3. Expected Results: A way to resolve this is to take the "from" line and break it up into 2 parts, and put the "reply-to" in there. I.E. From is still a pull down menu, and reply-to would be on the right hand side. It would say: Reply-To: (same as From) [Edit] I.e. the [Edit] would be a button, you could click on it, and it would open up a pop-up window where the user could enter any text they wanted to enter. Then you could do a similar thing withe the to line. Make it taller, with a larger font, but leave some room at the right for an [edit] button to pull up a pop-up window that would allow the user to see all 25 email addresses that they have put into the "to:" line at once, for instance. This kind of change would go a long way towards allowing the software to be used in many of the small organizations we work with, where the ease of use and accessibility of the software are priorities.
QA Contact: asa
Summary: Font for Entering Email Addresses is Too Small → Mechanism for entering email addresses (to, cc, bcc) is awkward
Additional comments on this issue were made here: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=239569#239569 A summary of the some of the comments here: a) you need to use the mouse to enter a "cc" or a "bcc" or you need to use an awkward work-around (enter, shift-TAB, then the "c" key). The user is going to probably try to tab down to the next line to put the bcc or cc in but the cursor will end up way down in the message body. b) It is cumbersome to view a large number of emails (i.e. more than 5) c) there is no visual indication of your "focus" if you do press the "tab" key from the "reply-to" address it jumps to the "to" address but it looks like the cursor disappears
Severity: enhancement → normal
Is this bug similar to bug 226468?
(In reply to comment #0) > I think that it is kind > of wierd that a large amount of screen space is allocated to the from line > (something you normally don't want to change), but a much smaller space is > allocated to the "to" line What? You mean the horizontal space? > A way to resolve this is to take the "from" line and break it up into 2 parts, > and put the "reply-to" in there. The "reply-to"? What are you talking about? > Then you could do a similar thing withe the to line. Make it taller, with a > larger font, but leave some room at the right for an [edit] button to pull up > a pop-up window that would allow the user to see all 25 email addresses that > they have put into the "to:" line at once, for instance. Note that the term "line" is not making much sense in this context -- the compose window has any number of fields, each of which might be said to be on its own "line". I suggest duping this to bug 252665, which is at least well-described and requests a specific feature, which I think would offer you at least some of what you're looking for.
Severity: normal → enhancement
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Hardware: PC → All
(In reply to comment #2) > Is this bug similar to bug 226468? no (In reply to comment #3) > I suggest duping this to bug 252665, which is at least well-described and > requests a specific feature, which I think would offer you at least some of what > you're looking for. indeed, bug 252665 addresses much of comment 1 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 252665 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.