Closed
Bug 218756
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
Update to latest DOM Level 3 XPath specification
Categories
(Core :: XSLT, defect, P3)
Core
XSLT
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla1.6alpha
People
(Reporter: peterv, Assigned: peterv)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
5.73 KB,
patch
|
axel
:
review+
jst
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
1.27 KB,
patch
|
axel
:
review+
bzbarsky
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Error numbers changed and code on XPathException became writeable, I have a
patch for that. Other changes is that the evaluate methods on XPathExpression
and XPathEvaluator now take and return a DOMObject instead of a XPathResult.
Note that there seems to be an error in the exception definitions in DOM Level 3
specs, they remove "readonly attribute" from code, but that makes it invalid idl
(still need the "attribute").
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #131142 -
Flags: superreview?(jst)
Attachment #131142 -
Flags: review?(axel)
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 131142 [details] [diff] [review]
v1
I take it that there is more work coming up?
r=axel@pike.org for error codes and exception on no resolver.
Of course,
+ mResolver->LookupNamespaceURI(prefix, ns);
+ NS_ENSURE_SUCCESS(rv, rv);
indicates that you should actually assign the return value of
LookupNamespaceURI to rv.
Attachment #131142 -
Flags: review?(axel) → review+
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 131142 [details] [diff] [review]
v1
sr=jst
Attachment #131142 -
Flags: superreview?(jst) → superreview+
Assignee | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: -- → P3
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.6alpha
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
Actually, I can roll in the DOMObject chang, it's easier than I thought.
Assignee | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #131142 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 131145 [details] [diff] [review]
v2
Sorry about the earlier (premature as it turns out) r/sr request.
Attachment #131145 -
Flags: superreview?(jst)
Attachment #131145 -
Flags: review?(axel)
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 131145 [details] [diff] [review]
v2
sr=jst
Attachment #131145 -
Flags: superreview?(jst) → superreview+
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
Attachment #131145 -
Flags: review?(axel) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
Checked in.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
Reopening, I missed a spot :-/.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #132739 -
Flags: superreview?(jst)
Attachment #132739 -
Flags: review?(axel)
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Status: REOPENED → ASSIGNED
Comment 11•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 132739 [details] [diff] [review]
Additional patch
oh, that's why I wasn't sure if this thing landed or not. As I found the old
error codes recently.
r=axel@pike.org
Attachment #132739 -
Flags: review?(axel) → review+
![]() |
||
Comment 12•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 132739 [details] [diff] [review]
Additional patch
sr=bzbarsky
Attachment #132739 -
Flags: superreview?(jst) → superreview+
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•21 years ago
|
||
Fixed. Really.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago → 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•