Closed
Bug 222298
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
Cooper Black along with mixture of fonts makes Firebird page look unprofessional
Categories
(www.mozilla.org :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: keith, Assigned: bugs)
References
()
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 Firebird/0.7 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 Firebird/0.7 The use of Cooper Black in conjunction with so many other fonts makes the Firebird page look awkward and unprofessional. Two of the two friends of mine I've talked to about this agree. Cooper Black almost always looks awkward and dumb, in my opinion, but reducing the number of fonts on the page would improve the site as well. There is currently a pretty big number of fonts used: 1. "mozilla" in logo 2. "FIREBIRD" in logo 3. Cooper Black 4. "mozilla" in download box (only on front page) 5. Arial in download select box 6. Verdana for feature list, rest of page text I think this should be trimmed down to use maybe two or three fonts, and I think the use of Cooper Black should be eliminated. (The two friends agree that Cooper Black looks bad on the page.) Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
I found a seventh font: the NOW text. It looks like it might be the same font as FIREBIRD, but without the fire effects applied.
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
page redesigned on Oct 15 12:27
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•16 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Websites
Updated•12 years ago
|
Component: www.mozilla.org → General
Product: Websites → www.mozilla.org
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•