Closed
Bug 223221
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
DNS: IPv6: Camino builds after 09-17-2003 are loading images slow.
Categories
(Camino Graveyard :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 231118
People
(Reporter: camino, Assigned: mikepinkerton)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
57.11 KB,
application/octet-stream
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030818 Camino/0.7+ Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030818 Camino/0.7+ Right after the 20030818 NB camino started to have image loading performance issues. Images load but take longer that normal. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. First go to www.apple.com with the 20030818 NB 2. Then go there again with a more recent nightly build. Actual Results: Camino is waiting longer for images to load properly in more recent nightly buidls. Expected Results: Camino should load images as fast as the 20030818 NB or Mozilla 1.5.
I pinned down the exact time frame when the issue started to suface: between 2003-09-17-02 (ok) build and the 2003-10-02-11 (broken) build.
Assignee | ||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Summary: Camino builds after 08-18-2003 are loading images slow. → Camino builds after 09-17-2003 are loading images slow.
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
I am reasonably sure this problem wasn't in the 9/26 build I had. That narrows it down somewhat. Checking bonsai, there were a bunch of IO/threading/stream listener changes made 10/5. Very tempting . . . but apparently not the right bugs. The next best guesses I can come up with are bug 187899, bug 218837 (although thi s one was apparently backed out), and bug 211462 - a Mac specific bug dealing with graphics . . . but it seems very odd that it would screw things up.
Yesterday I noticed something. If I ran the post 1002 Camino for a while and then switched to the 0917 version. The 0917 version would have some of the troubles too. The way to fix it was to clear cach and everything worked again. No this didn't help for the 1002 build. So I think there is a cache issue involved here.
Updated•21 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
some things to check: - reverse the order in your steps to reproduce - clear cache every time between launches when comparing - check mozilla builds from the same time periods. do they have the same problem?
It seems that the Camino 20031030 NB doesn't have these issues anymore. Mike, any idea what happend?
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
No, the bug is still there. It turns up reliably for me at http://www.daytondailynews.com. I grabbed a network log, but I don't think the problem is in the network. The page source (already downloaded) shows lots of content which just isn't appearing on the screen.
How odd. Let's say that the issue is now less obvious but is indeed still there. Especially the website mentioned in Comment #8 shows the big difference between the latest nightly builds and the pre oktober builds.
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
is this the same thing? (compare to safari) http://www.scifi.com/farscape/characters/zhaan.html
Comment 11•21 years ago
|
||
A poster in the Mozillazine forum comes up huge. Looks like its an IPv6 hostname lookup bug in 10.2 which was fixed in 10.3. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 219512 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 12•21 years ago
|
||
REOPEN: There have been several changes that affect Mac OS in this area recently, so I'd like to hook this up as a depends, since I don't keep up on Camino. What I'm most concerned with is if this problem happens in 10.2 (probably should not anymore) and 10.3 (probably should still happen), in current builds (aka 2004).
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
QA Contact: benc
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Summary: Camino builds after 09-17-2003 are loading images slow. → DNS: IPv6: Camino builds after 09-17-2003 are loading images slow.
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 231118 ***
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago → 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•