Closed Bug 224678 Opened 21 years ago Closed 19 years ago

nsComposerRegistration.cpp has suspicious code

Categories

(Core :: DOM: Editor, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: mmokrejs, Assigned: timeless)

References

Details

Attachments

(2 obsolete files)

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030826 Build Identifier: Hi, I get the following with current snapshot on Tru64 Unix 5.1A: cxx: Warning: nsComposerRegistration.cpp, line 59: integer conversion resulted in truncation static NS_DEFINE_CID(kHTMLEditorCommandTableCID, NS_HTMLEDITOR_COMMANDTABLE_CID); -------^ cxx: Warning: nsComposerRegistration.cpp, line 60: integer conversion resulted in truncation static NS_DEFINE_CID(kHTMLEditorDocStateCommandTableCID, NS_HTMLEDITOR_DOCSTATE_COMMANDTABLE_CID); -------^ cxx: Warning: nsComposerRegistration.cpp, line 229: integer conversion resulted in truncation { "HTML Editor command table", NS_HTMLEDITOR_COMMANDTABLE_CID, -----------------------------------^ cxx: Warning: nsComposerRegistration.cpp, line 233: integer conversion resulted in truncation { "HTML Editor doc state command table", NS_HTMLEDITOR_DOCSTATE_COMMANDTABLE_CID, ---------------------------------------------^ Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Similarly, I get: cxx: Warning: nsEditorRegistration.cpp, line 60: integer conversion resulted in truncation static NS_DEFINE_CID(kEditorCommandTableCID, NS_EDITORCOMMANDTABLE_CID); -------^ cxx: Warning: nsEditorRegistration.cpp, line 154: integer conversion resulted in truncation { "Editor Command Table", NS_EDITORCOMMANDTABLE_CID, ------------------------------^
*** Bug 224677 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Editor, not localization. The problem, of course, is that the CID format used in Mozilla is: { 0x00000000, 0x0000, 0x0000, { 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 } } while the CIDs in question use { 0x00000000, 0x0000, 0x0000, { 0x0000, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 } } (so the first element of the sub-array does not fit in the PRUint8 it's assigned into, and the last element does not exist). I'm actually somewhat surprised this works... ;)
Assignee: localization → mozeditor
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Localization → Editor: Core
Ever confirmed: true
QA Contact: amyy → sairuh
Sorry for spam, but I've given up on being surprised that a segment of code works. But then, I'm fighting with the Microsoft Win32 API ;-)
Hi, any progress on this? ;)
Attached patch new cid (obsolete) — Splinter Review
I'm tired of seeing a warning for this on windows. I've issued a new cid because i don't want to rely on 'correcting' the old cid.
Assignee: mozeditor → timeless
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #143728 - Flags: superreview?(dbaron)
Attachment #143728 - Flags: review?(brade)
Attachment #143728 - Flags: approval1.7b?
Attachment #143728 - Flags: review?(brade) → review+
Comment on attachment 143728 [details] [diff] [review] new cid If nobody uses the CID, why do we have it?
(Meaning, why do we bother with an entry in the modules list if nobody ever does a CreateInstance or a GetService for that CID / contractid (empty contractid).)
Comment on attachment 143728 [details] [diff] [review] new cid for lack of answer to my question, marking sr- to get off my review queue
Attachment #143728 - Flags: superreview?(dbaron) → superreview-
well, the creature eventually leads to an nsIControllerCommandTable, i wonder if there was an internal customer which had some use for it. smfr: is there really no need for this cid and the constructor it chains to? killing the pair would be nice...
Depends on: 201257
I'd have to spend time looking around to see what the state of things there is, time which I don't have right now.
Attachment #143728 - Flags: approval1.7b? → approval1.7?
Comment on attachment 143728 [details] [diff] [review] new cid Can we have a patch that removes this CID and its use at line 154 (remove the nsModuleComponentInfo array element initializer)? /be
Comment on attachment 143728 [details] [diff] [review] new cid it is used consider: Index: nsEditorRegistration.cpp =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/editor/libeditor/build/nsEditorRegistration.cpp,v retrieving revision 1.34 diff -u0 -r1.34 nsEditorRegistration.cpp --- nsEditorRegistration.cpp +++ nsEditorRegistration.cpp @@ -56,0 +57 @@ +#if 0 @@ -60,0 +62 @@ +#endif @@ -100 +102 @@ - +#if 0 @@ -119 +121 @@ - +#endif @@ -153 +155 @@ - +#if 0 @@ -157 +159 @@ - +#endif nsEditorRegistration.cpp /mnt/ibm/mozhack/mozilla/editor/libeditor/build/nsEditorRegistration.cpp: In function `nsresult nsEditorControllerConstructor(nsISupports *, const nsIID &, void **)': /mnt/ibm/mozhack/mozilla/editor/libeditor/build/nsEditorRegistration.cpp:87: `kEditorCommandTableCID' undeclared (first use this function) libeditor uses this CID to ensure service semantics and lifetime. It could bloat itself with startup and shutdown stuff and a static critter which held a reference, but i don't think that's a good tradeoff.
Attachment #143728 - Flags: superreview- → superreview?
@@ -56,0 +57 @@ +#if 0 @@ -60,0 +62 @@ +#endif @@ -100 +102 @@ - +#if 0 @@ -119 +121 @@ - +#endif @@ -153 +155 @@ - +#if 0 @@ -157 +159 @@ - +#endif diff -u would be a little more useful here, timeless.
Attachment #143728 - Flags: approval1.7?
Attachment #143728 - Flags: superreview?
Attachment #143728 - Flags: superreview?(tor)
Attachment #143728 - Flags: superreview?(tor) → superreview+
Attachment #143728 - Flags: approval1.8b3?
Attachment #143728 - Flags: approval1.8b3? → approval1.8b3+
Comment on attachment 143728 [details] [diff] [review] new cid mozilla/editor/libeditor/build/nsEditorRegistration.cpp 1.37
Attachment #143728 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
QA Contact: bugzilla → nobody
nsComposerRegistration.cpp needs to be fixed, too :)
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Attached patch new CIDs (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #186541 - Flags: superreview?(sfraser_bugs)
Attachment #186541 - Flags: review?(brade)
Attachment #186541 - Flags: superreview?(sfraser_bugs) → superreview+
Attachment #186541 - Flags: review?(brade) → review+
Attachment #186541 - Flags: approval1.8b3?
Attachment #186541 - Flags: approval1.8b3? → approval1.8b3+
Comment on attachment 186541 [details] [diff] [review] new CIDs mozilla/editor/composer/src/nsComposerRegistration.cpp 1.20 mozilla/editor/composer/src/nsComposerRegistration.cpp 1.21
Attachment #186541 - Attachment is obsolete: true
fixed now
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
QA Contact: nobody → editor
Flags: in-testsuite-
OS: Other → All
Hardware: Other → All
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: