Closed
Bug 228099
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
Parse U+000A, " " and "
" correctly in attributes
Categories
(Core :: DOM: HTML Parser, defect)
Core
DOM: HTML Parser
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: iannbugzilla, Unassigned)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
556 bytes,
text/html
|
Details |
In title="" and possibly other places U+000A, " " and "
" get parsed as
newlines, U+000A should become a space and " " or "
" should become a
newline.
I think this demonstrates this problem and also a similar problem with tabs.
For previous discussions see bug 67127
Attachment #137213 -
Attachment is patch: false
Attachment #137213 -
Attachment mime type: text/plain → text/html
![]() |
||
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
> U+000A should become a space
Why? It's not at all a space...
See Hixie's comment in bug 67127#143
Summary: Parse U+000A, " " and "
" correctly → Parse U+000A, " " and "
" correctly in attributes
![]() |
||
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
For future reference, "but 67127 comment 143" will get properly linkified...
that comment just says "we should do something weird". It doesn't say WHY.
Clear links to the "why" explanation belonged in comment 0.
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
Excuse me, but isn't this a dupe of bug 47078, which has already been blocking
bug 67127 before this one was even filed?
For the explanation, see bug 47078, or bug 67127 comment 37, bug 67127 comment
51, bug 67127 comment 62...
This is partly covered by bug 47078 but also covers what to do with the
character entity " "
![]() |
||
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
Well, as filed this bug (and bug 47078) would change the values of "value"
attributes, which is a good way to break half the web. So someone better
provide me with good justification not to wontfix them both out of hand as not
feasible given the content that's out there. Tooltips (bug 67127 comment 62)
are not justification; we could treat the "title" attribute differently from
others, and that would fix tooltips. The other cited reasons are pretty vacuous
in light of all the much more serious violations of the HTML spec that have to
happen in the parser to handle real-world content....
And before someone suggests standards vs quirks mode, I am highly opposed to
adding yet another ill-tested "standards" codepath in a parser that's
non-standards-compliant by design.
Blocks: 47078
![]() |
||
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
No response; marking wontfix.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
Please reopen.
In XHTML for sure (see XML rec) and very likely in HTML as well (unfortunately I
do not have acces to the SGML spec, but see the comments in #67127) the values
of attributes defined as "CDATA" should not be stripped of beginning/trailing
newlines when they are encoded as entities, like in e.g.
<input type="hidden" value=" test 3 here " name="h2">
What actually happens is that the newline between "test 3" and "here" is kept,
but all others are discarded. When tested with IE5 or IE6, all newlines are kept.
Whitespace, when encoded in CDATA attribute values, should not be stripped (but
raw whitespace, including raw newlines, should be stripped of beginning/end of
values, and IE does not do that). And the first reporter is right if he says
that raw nl/cr/tab anywhere in a CDATA attribute should be replaced by space
(that's what both XML and HTML4.01 state).
This is not, for once, tooltip-related (and thus not a dupe of #67127), and
causes real problems with ECMAscript apps that deal with textareas and
preformatted text stored passed in <input type="hidden"> elements. Had to work
around it with <pre>.
![]() |
||
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
> In XHTML for sure (see XML rec)
That has nothing to do with this bug. This is a bug on the tag-soup parser; the
XML parser follows the XML rec.
> the values of attributes defined as "CDATA" should not be stripped of
> beginning/trailing newlines when they are encoded as entities
That's not what this bug was about.
Comment 11•19 years ago
|
||
I have just submitted bug 322270 to address just the issue of U+000A's in attribute values, but with the need for an exception for the "value" attribute explicitly recognized. Comments (or criticisms) are very welcome.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•