If you think a bug might affect users in the 57 release, please set the correct tracking and status flags for Release Management.

Evaluate/Migrate/Update The XPToolkit Architecture docs

RESOLVED INVALID

Status

www.mozilla.org
General
--
trivial
RESOLVED INVALID
14 years ago
5 years ago

People

(Reporter: Waldo, Assigned: sheppy)

Tracking

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

(URL)

It's old and doesn't work with the new look of mozilla.org.  It'll probably need
the stylesheet setting for the ToC-less look.
reassigning endico's bugs to default owner
Assignee: endico → mozilla.webmaster

Comment 2

13 years ago
I'm willing to update the markup of those pages, however I'm not sure how I
should put the default style of mozilla.org there.

fantasai, could you enable that?

Comment 3

13 years ago
done

Updated

13 years ago
Assignee: mozilla.webmaster → bug

Comment 4

13 years ago
fantasai, could you enable it for everything inside ./xptoolkit/? I know I
should be able to do it myself, but I don't have CVS set up correctly yet.

Comment 5

13 years ago
By the way, the xulintro.html file is already quite good (maybe we should insert
some ABBR elements and check the classes on some PRE elements). I could move the
rest to a separate bug if desired.

Comment 6

13 years ago
From this point, this bug can only be fixed when all documents inside
<http://www.mozilla.org/xpfe/xptoolkit/> are.
Blocks: 151557
Keywords: helpwanted
Summary: Make Intro to XUL conformant with mozilla.org theme → Fix The XPToolkit Architecture

Comment 7

13 years ago
todo list:

* colorpicker.html
* dragDrop.html
* events.html
* fragments.html
* introClipDD.html
* keys.html
* menus.html
* meters.html
* overlays.html
* persistence.html
* popups.html
* splitter.html
* tabs.html
* toolbars.html
* trees.html
* windows.html

Comment 8

13 years ago
This folder needs some review. Not all files are finished and not everything is
part of the documentations, as it seems. However, with the exception of
'DataFlavors.html' they are all using markup that is written according to the
mozilla.org Markup Reference. (I may have missed a file though, please point
them out to me.)

I'm going to leave this bug open until I get enough review (and clarification
about the above mentioned issue) or until I am sure all is fixed.
Keywords: helpwanted
QA Contact: danielwang → www-mozilla-org
(In reply to comment #8)
> This folder needs some review. Not all files are finished and not everything is
> part of the documentations, as it seems. However, with the exception of
> 'DataFlavors.html' they are all using markup that is written according to the
> mozilla.org Markup Reference. (I may have missed a file though, please point
> them out to me.)
> 
> I'm going to leave this bug open until I get enough review (and clarification
> about the above mentioned issue) or until I am sure all is fixed.

Can one of the website drivers check out this folder and see if it is all ok? If so, please resolve this bug.

Comment 10

12 years ago
I think this content falls under Deb's domain now.

Comment 11

11 years ago
IMO, this bug should be resolved as FIXED
This content needs to be evaluated to see if it's still useful, and if it is it needs to be migrated to the MDC wiki and updated.  Once migrated these URLs should be redirected to the new wiki locations.  Adding Eric Shepherd to the cc list since developer documentation is now his domain.
Summary: Fix The XPToolkit Architecture → Evaluate/Migrate/Update The XPToolkit Architecture docs
(Assignee)

Comment 13

11 years ago
I'm poking through this material to start sorting out what needs to migrate still (some of it already has), and what needs updating.  This may take a while, but I'm on it.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
(Assignee)

Updated

11 years ago
Assignee: bug → eshepherd
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
(Assignee)

Comment 14

11 years ago
As I try to understand what XPToolkit is and its relevance, who should I go to with questions?
Neil Deakin might be a reasonable bet.
(Assignee)

Comment 16

11 years ago
Neil says not to migrate this because it's too old to be useful.  I'm marking this as resolved INVALID because nothing else makes sense to me.  If anyone disagrees, feel free to change it.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Product: mozilla.org → Websites
Component: www.mozilla.org → General
Product: Websites → www.mozilla.org
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.