Closed
Bug 232470
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Scrollbars overpaint DIVs on Mac
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: GFX: Mac, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 191265
People
(Reporter: jhpedemonte, Assigned: sfraser_bugs)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
8.17 KB,
text/html
|
Details |
This is actually an offshoot of bug 126263 - Scrollbars overpaint DIVs. That bug was created due to a customer case where a DHTML menu would appear to paint 'behind' the scrollbar. Take a look at the customer case (http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=109667&action=view). If you click on "File" in the page, it will open a DHTML menu; then click on "Print" or "Close" to open a submenu. Here you will see that the scrollbar paints over the menu. The problem is that the native scrollbar actually sits on top of the window, whereas the DHTML menus are actually drawn by mozilla directly on the window. The fix in bug 126263 was to remove native scrollbars and have Mozilla create them, with the platforms look and feel. So we need to either back out Mac OS X native scrollbars and revert to Mozilla drawn scrollbars, or find a way to allow the native scrollbars to be overpainted by DIVs.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
Adding some other Mac folks. Note that this affects Camino, also.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
Reworked testcase from bug 126263. This one has several HTML elements under a DIV. Only the scrollbars appear above the DIV. Also, this is not an issue under Safari; plus Safari has thinner scrollbars!
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
this is a dupe of a much older bug, fwiw. we've had this problem for years.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
I couldn't find a bug that specifically dealt with this issue, so I opened a new one. If you can find the dup, please let me know. Also, was this also a problem before bug 188254 (Land chimera's form controls on the trunk) was landed?
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
this started when we landed native scrollbars in mac mozilla, which was easily a year and a half ago, if not longer. i think this can be duped to 191265, no?
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
yeah, that looks to be the correct dup. i didn't read the whole bug. thanks. dup -> bug 191265 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 191265 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Updated•15 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•