Closed
Bug 233057
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
<tbody> makes the printing go wild
Categories
(Core :: Print Preview, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
EXPIRED
People
(Reporter: minusf, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
User-Agent:
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sk-SK; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
in the example above (http://fred.pentacom.sk/Linea.html) there is a heavy use
of the tbody (which is correct). if there is an empty <tbody> tag the page is
not correctly rendered, after removing this empty tbody the page is fine in the
browser but still ``strange'' in the print prebview. download the example, view
it, than remove the one empty tbody but leave the others. without the tbody's
the print preview is beautiful
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
please look at #233135 i think these are interrelated.
the <tbody> seems to "block" the page division also. if the table is longer
than a page the next page's <thead> and data is not rendered correctly.
please look at http://fred.pentacom.sk/e.html and make a print preview.
after removing the empty <tbody> tag (#233135) the table renders correctly but
the print preview is still incorrect. after removing all the <tbody>'s or
leaving just the first the page rendering and printing are correct but i losse
the rules=groups parametere of the <table> and dont get rules for rows, only for
columns
Sorry, I can't see any difference in the first testcase between the preview with
and without the empty tbody. Maybe bug 217769 (of which bug 233135 is a
duplicate) fixed your problem. The only problem remaining are those spelling
errors :)
But I can confirm comment 2 with Firefox 20040423 on Win2000. If the table does
not fit on the first page, it is completelly moved to the next page. That is
strange.
If you also don't see the first problem, I suggest changing the summary to be
more specific and change this bug to only report the second problem.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2)
> Sorry, I can't see any difference in the first testcase between the preview with
> and without the empty tbody. Maybe bug 217769 (of which bug 233135 is a
> duplicate) fixed your problem. The only problem remaining are those spelling
> errors :)
please note, that bug 217769 is not completely resolved yet
(http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217769#c13) and you should see the
difference. the difference is that with the empty tbody no rules are present,
while after removing the first empty tbody (line 32 in the example file) the
rules appear. (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6)
Gecko/20040210 Firefox/0.8). and according to a private mail i have got this
will not be fixed. it wont work using html tags, only using css.
Collapsed borders are a more general problem and won't be fixed soon.
I don't see the borders in both your examples, because I have a larger font set
in Windows, and that's causing problems too.
Bug 217769 has done what it could. It even made a workaround for ILLEGAL HTML
(bug 217769 comment 2), which you have in your source too. I wouldn't expect
them to fix anything else soon.
Anyway, you should concentrate this bug on some of the issues raised in your
comment 1 and update your summary to be more specific. The current state is too
general.
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01".
This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that
bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are
highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code.
While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we
are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce
this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a
copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and
you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug
(given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more
reproduction information if you have it.
If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not
changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved.
Thank you for your help in this matter.
The latest beta releases can be obtained from:
Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/
Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html
Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above
comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•