Closed
Bug 234322
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Spell checker should handle punctuation/symbols appropriately (e.g. "etc", "etc.")
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Message Compose Window, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: mozilla, Assigned: mscott)
Details
User-Agent:
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040210 Firefox/0.8
If I create a message which includes "etc.", the spell checker highlights "etc"
and suggests changing it to "etc.", even though the fullstop is already there.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Write a message which includes "etc."
2.Run the spell checker
Actual Results:
Spell checker flags "etc" as wrong and suggests "etc."
Expected Results:
Spell checker should recognise the fullstop as part of the word and not claim a
spelling error
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
should this bug be re-summed to just 'SpellCheck should recognize punctuation as
part of a word?" I have the same problem with e.g. and http:// references; I
know that this bug is really specific, but making it hinge on all punctuation
would allow the http:// spellcheck-avoidance enhancement (bug 172186) to be a
simple http://[^ ]+ entry in a dictionary on top of this bug.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
I don't think it'd be a good idea to always include punctuation as part of a
word, because every sentence-ending word would then be flagged, unless there
were additional changes to account for this.
Changing the summary to "Spell checker should handle punctuation/symbols
appropriately" - even more general.
Summary: Spell checker recognises "etc." as "etc" → Spell checker should handle punctuation/symbols appropriately (e.g. "etc", "etc.")
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
There is some more odd behavior. For example,
"couldnt" will be flagged with no suggested spelling while
"could'nt" will have a suggested spelling of "couldn't". The spell check needed
the apostrophe in someplace to suggest a spelling using an apostrophe.
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
version 1.0+ (20050803)
Both "etc." and "etc" work for me. This was probably fixed by the new inline
spellchecking bug.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•