Closed
Bug 236313
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Mozilla crashes after clicking "SKYPASS" at Korean Air site
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: v.kazmirenko, Assigned: tor)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: crash, testcase, verified1.7)
Attachments
(4 files, 5 obsolete files)
2.76 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
306 bytes,
text/html
|
Details | |
246 bytes,
text/html
|
Details | |
4.99 KB,
patch
|
darin.moz
:
superreview+
mkaply
:
approval1.7+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 Open http://www.koreanair.com/ At top of page there is link "SKYPASS". Click it. After opening this page Mozilla crashes. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Reporter | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Summary: Mozilla crashes after clicking "SKYPASS" and opening page (URL is provided above) → Mozilla crashes after clicking "SKYPASS" at Korean Air site
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
confirming crash FF 20040302 Win2k, I get a popup R0625, Pure Virtual Call.
Keywords: crash,
stackwanted
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
Confirming "R0625, Pure Virtual Call". This is on Gecko/20040113, Windows 2000. However, the behaviour isn't very reproductible here. The amount of time before the crash seems quit unconsistent.
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Confirming. Could be a dupe of 236196 but it seems to be slightly different.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Also crashes on linux: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040227 Firefox/0.8.0+
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
Bug occurs in 2003-09-03-05 trunk Linux, which is the oldest nightly build I could find. Bug does not occur in Mozilla 1.4 on Linux.
Assignee: general → jdunn
Component: Browser-General → ImageLib
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
load the testcase. reload a few times. crash tested trunk build 2004030308 <img src="javascript:SKchoosePhoto()" name="SKbnrPhoto"> SKchoosePhoto is: document.SKbnrPhoto.src="resource:///res/samples/Anieyes.gif";
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
regrsession between linux trunk builds 2003071005 and 2003071122 bug 70030 or bug 212133? I'll try backing stuff out.
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
further testing just shows that bug 212133 just got the DOM working used in the testcase, so no regression.
Keywords: regression
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
I can't reproduce it on linux with Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Epiphany/1.0.7 and Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040301 Firefox/0.8.0+ (Neither the original page nor the testcase...)
Comment 12•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 236420 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 236196 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•20 years ago
|
||
What appears to be happening here is that the src="javascript:..." load comes in first and kicks off a load. Deeper down we notice that it's javascript and run it, which kicks off another load on the same image, but now with the real URI. But since the previous load is still ongoing we pick the wrong request to use (current instead of pending), which gets overwritten when processing returns to the first load.
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•20 years ago
|
||
Ok, let's attach the patch and not the testcase this time...
Attachment #143546 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #143547 -
Flags: review?(pavlov)
Attachment #143547 -
Flags: review?(pavlov)
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•20 years ago
|
||
Attachment #143547 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #143722 -
Flags: review?(pavlov)
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #143722 -
Flags: review?(pavlov) → review+
Attachment #143722 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
![]() |
||
Comment 17•20 years ago
|
||
Hmm.. so why is this actually crashing? Are we double-releasing an imgRequestProxy or something? With that patch, won't function foo() { img.src = "javascript:bar()"; } function bar() { img.src = "http://whatever"; } <img src="javascript:foo()"> still crash? This time because mPendingRequest is clobbered?
![]() |
||
Comment 18•20 years ago
|
||
Oh, and no matter what that should be a PRPackedBool and live with the other PRPackedBools.
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•20 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 143722 [details] [diff] [review] modify both places with test Yes, the double-indirect thing kills it.
Attachment #143722 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #143722 -
Flags: superreview?(bzbarsky)
Comment 21•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 235843 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•20 years ago
|
||
Comment 23•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 240184 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 24•20 years ago
|
||
Tor, any progress here? This one seems like a good one to try to get for 1.7.
Flags: blocking1.7? → blocking1.7+
Comment 25•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 242334 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 26•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 145337 [details] [diff] [review] different fix - need to discuss with pavlov i ran with this patch and i can't find anything that breaks.. go for it
Attachment #145337 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #145337 -
Flags: superreview?(darin)
Comment 27•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 145337 [details] [diff] [review] different fix - need to discuss with pavlov you seem to be transforming the retval of imgILoader::LoadImage into an inout param. is that right? if so, shouldn't you change the IDL accordingly?
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•20 years ago
|
||
Attachment #145337 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 29•20 years ago
|
||
I think we decided on IRC that there is no point to supporting [inout] on the result of LoadImage (that all callers anyways just want the resulting value and never pass anything but null). so, how about just making sure that the implementation of LoadImage sets *_retval to nsnull before doing anything else. that way, the fact that CreateNewProxyForRequest treats _retval as an inout param will be inconsequential to the caller of LoadImage or LoadImageWithChannel.
Comment 30•20 years ago
|
||
To clarify my last comment: whatever we do for LoadImage needs to be done for LoadImageWithChannel as well.
Assignee | ||
Comment 31•20 years ago
|
||
Attachment #147651 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 32•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 147664 [details] [diff] [review] tweak per irc discussion sr=darin might be good to indicate with a comment the reason why it is significant that *_retval be nulled out.
Attachment #147664 -
Flags: superreview+
Assignee | ||
Comment 33•20 years ago
|
||
Checked in on trunk with comments added. Leaving open for baking.
Comment 34•20 years ago
|
||
I noticed some strange image loading behaviour in a build that I did this morning. My last build was on 5/3 and I didn't see the bahviour from that build. I have a homepage with several small images on it which link to larger versions of the images and they are all local to my hard drive. When I click on one of the smaller images, the page area is blanked out (white) for a moment before the image is displayed. Sometimes, this blank time is a fraction of a second and sometimes it's as long as three seconds. The image paints very quickly after the pause so it appears that something's going on that's not related to image painting. I also noticed this with the MozillaZine png at the top of the page though it is very short there as the PNG is probably fairly small. Someone pointed me to this checkin as a possibility.
Comment 35•20 years ago
|
||
Note: the behavior described in #34 is not limited to pages with images. On an internal site I'm developing (which uses only stylesheets) I've noticed that between the 20040506 zip build and the 20040505 zip build (Windows Firefox), many pages are MUCH slower on initial load. It seems once they're cached it's fine. In particular, the pages w/ form controls of any kind, be it text entry boxes, or form buttons, are noticeable... you can easily see the form component being drawn before all other page content. Should another bug be opened about the slow rendering?
Comment 36•20 years ago
|
||
This checkin wasn't the cause. I backed it out, did a build and it's still there. I'll file a bug for now.
Comment 37•20 years ago
|
||
Filed bug http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242856 for the other problem that is NOT related to this bug.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #145337 -
Flags: superreview?(darin)
Attachment #147664 -
Flags: approval1.7?
Comment 38•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 147664 [details] [diff] [review] tweak per irc discussion a=mkaply
Attachment #147664 -
Flags: approval1.7? → approval1.7+
Assignee | ||
Comment 39•20 years ago
|
||
Checked in on branch.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 40•20 years ago
|
||
Verified as fix on latest 1.7 branch Win06-24, Mac06-30 & Linux06-29 builds. Changing keywords from fixed1.7 to verified1.7. Leave this bug status "as is" until this bug be verified on trunk again...
Keywords: fixed1.7 → verified1.7
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•