Closed
Bug 236681
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Camino sometimes fails to display images embedded in documents
Categories
(Camino Graveyard :: Page Layout, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
Camino0.9
People
(Reporter: bugmail, Assigned: mikepinkerton)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: testcase)
Attachments
(2 files, 3 obsolete files)
Camino/2004-02-29-08 sometimes fails to display images included in web documents
such as HTML pages. Camino will successfully display the image when accessed
directly.
In the example URL, Camino will not display the columnist's image in the sidebar
which begins with the text, "Acquiring Jan Hrdina is a coup for the New Jersey
Devils...."
Current Mozilla trunk builds such as 2004-02-25-05 display the image successfully.
Re-tested with a fresh profile and it works. Triaged old profile, discovered
that if files cookperm.txt and hostperm.1 are removed the testcase works. What
generates these files? Do these files cause Camino to block loading of some images?
Although URL was displayed by camino and firefox and image was compared, there
is no difference.
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; ja-JP; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040306
Camino/0.7+
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; ja-JP; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040305
Firefox/0.8.0+
As far as I know you can indeed block content using cookperm.txt. Note that that
is also possible with userContent.css. Please let me know if I can close the bug.
Sure you *can* block it, but at no point have I ever configured Camino to do so.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
this either sounds like a mozilla bug or wfm since we don't have any steps to
reproduce.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Reopening. Right now,
<http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/spo/med/2004/05/ipt/1083908088.jpg> won’t
display in 2004050308 (v0.8b); it does in Mozilla-Mac/2004042110. Does anyone
else see this?
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WORKSFORME → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
curious. what's special about that image?
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → Camino0.9
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
Hm, one possible thing is the server doesn’t return a Content-Type.
GET http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/spo/med/2004/05/ipt/1083908088.jpg HTTP/1.0
Accept: */*
Host: us.i1.yimg.com
User-Agent: Interarchy/6.2
HTTP/1.1 200 Probably OK
Via: HTTP/1.0 spcss29. (IBM-PROXY-WTE-US), HTTP/1.1 spcss31. (IBM-PROXY-WTE-US)
Cache-Control: private, no-cache
Warning: 299 spcss29. "Origin server sent an HTTP/0.9 response; translated to
HTTP/1.x by proxy."
Comment 12•20 years ago
|
||
What exactly does "won't display" mean? 404? Timeout? Blank page load (if so,
what does the title bar say)?
(I can't test this, since that images is on server blocked by my hosts file and
thus doesn't show up in *any* browser)
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
Blank display. The URL bar shows the URL, the titlebar shows 1083908088.jpg
(JPEG image, 225x169 pixels), and the tab shows a truncated portion of that
title, as expected. The browser content area remains blank.
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•20 years ago
|
||
Tried to configure my Apache to never send a Content-Type, but failed. It always
insisted on sending at least Content-Type: text/plain.
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•20 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 16•20 years ago
|
||
Okay, today this problem manifested itself in a different way, using *local
files* created by JAlbum. It appears to have something to do with width and
height attributes on images in this case. Image scaling is not involved,
because the width and height values correspond to the actual image dimensions.
The testcase fails in 2004060208 (v0.8b+), and WFM using Moz-Mac/1.7RC2.
Note also that the URL in comment 9 now appears to display using 2004060208
(v0.8b+).
Reporter | ||
Comment 17•20 years ago
|
||
Oops, old HTML testcase wasn't quite what it claimed to be.
Attachment #150139 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Reporter | ||
Comment 18•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 150137 [details]
JPEG testcase
Absolutely my bad on this testcase. The image was being blocked by
userContent.css rules. XP
Attachment #150137 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #150644 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 19•20 years ago
|
||
I don't see the problem here. I never did. Can we mark this bug WFM?
Reporter | ||
Comment 20•20 years ago
|
||
Sure.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago → 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•