problems with not unique email address in mailing lists and ldif import



MailNews: Address Book & Contacts
14 years ago
12 years ago


(Reporter: Manfred Mayr, Unassigned)


Windows XP

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)




14 years ago
User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

problems in the address boom can occure when an email address isn't unique

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. add a new address book, e.g. "test1"
2. add a new card: first name=a, last name=a,
3. add a new card: first name=b, last name=b,
4. add a new card: first name=c, last name=c,
5. add a new mailing list, e.g. "list1"
6. drag first card "a a" into it => ok
7. drag 2nd card "b b" into it => ok
8. drag 3rd card "c c" into it => doesn't work

Actual Results:  
the 3rd card couldn't be added in the mailing list
Happened to produce further problems. e.g. "a a" disappeared, but "c c" was
Produces also problems at ldif import.

Expected Results:  
all 3 cards should have been added to the mailing list

Comment 1

14 years ago
Most users wish it was NOT possible to get duplicate entries in the address
book. So this should be resolved as WONTFIX if bug 45946 is still valid.


14 years ago
Summary: problems with nor unique email address in mailing lists and ldif import → problems with not unique email address in mailing lists and ldif import
Product: Browser → Seamonkey


13 years ago
Assignee: sspitzer → mail
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01".

This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that
bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are
highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code.

While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we
are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce
this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a
copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and
you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug
(given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more
reproduction information if you have it.

If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not
changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved.
Thank you for your help in this matter.

The latest beta releases can be obtained from:
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above
comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.
Last Resolved: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.