Closed
Bug 239511
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Show mail in HTML-format for selected senders only
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Address Book, enhancement)
Thunderbird
Address Book
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: lupin.sansei, Unassigned)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 (www.proxomitron.de)
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 (www.proxomitron.de)
It would be nice, if the display-format of mails could be selected for specific
senders. All other mails should be displayed in the format selected under the
"View"-menu. And especially those in the Junk-folder should be displayed as
plain text, because these spams often contain images or other media content,
that should not be loaded without request.
Could this be solved with an option in the adress-book, where it is possible to
select the preferred message-sending-format?
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
related: bug 142149
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
See also bug 233109.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: sspitzer → mail
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01".
This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that
bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are
highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code.
While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we
are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce
this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a
copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and
you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug
(given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more
reproduction information if you have it.
If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not
changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved.
Thank you for your help in this matter.
The latest beta releases can be obtained from:
Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/
Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html
Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above
comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
i hate expiries
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Component: MailNews: Main Mail Window → Address Book
Product: Mozilla Application Suite → Thunderbird
Resolution: EXPIRED → ---
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
I recommend wontfix for this bug.
1) I think the days of hype about downgrading the display of HTML messages are over. I don't believe many users are ever switching View > Message Body as > ... to anything but "Original HTML".
2) We already have a highly complex system for determining the delivery format for outgoing messages, and would want to reduce that complexity rather than expand it. Implementing this RFE adds a lot of code and behaviour complexity for little benefit.
3) For the last 10 years since this was filed, this bug did not get any supportive comments, only 1 vote, and no dupes (couldn't find any).
4) Much of what this bug is trying to do is already implemented (e.g. protection against showing remote content, spam/junk/phishing filters etc.)
Wayne, or Magnus, can you make the call pls?
Flags: needinfo?(vseerror)
Flags: needinfo?(mkmelin+mozilla)
Whiteboard: [wontfix?]
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
beyond my experience. sorry to not be more helpful
Flags: needinfo?(vseerror)
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
Yeah I don't think this is worth doing.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago → 10 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(mkmelin+mozilla)
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•