239515 - page renders incorrectly

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 249828

(Core :: Layout, defect)

Description

[Barak]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040402 Firefox/0.8
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040402 Firefox/0.8

When i use latest firefox to browse to this page for example (it happends with a
lot of other pages in www.walla.co.il) it seems massed out.
i dont know the exact build it started to happen
all i know is i have mozilla 1.5 and ie and both render the page correctly.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.go to http://computers.walla.co.il/?w=/4000/526623
2.compare the page with older builds
3.

Actual Results:  
page massed out

Comment 1

[Boris Zbarsky [:bzbarsky]]

> page massed out

What does that mean?

The page seems to render fine with a current Linux Mozilla build...

Comment 2

[Barak]

(In reply to comment #1)
> > page massed out
> 
> What does that mean?
> 
> The page seems to render fine with a current Linux Mozilla build...

would u like me to attach a screenshot?

Comment 3

[Andrew Schultz]

I would assume the problem barak is seeing is that the content from the main
table column spills over into the left column, by about 20px.  I see that with
linux trunk 2004033007.

I'll attach a testcase

Comment 4

[Andrew Schultz]

Attachment: testcase

in this testcase, the text spills out of the table to the right.  Mozilla
honors the 100% width and the left-padding, at the cost of the div overflowing
from the table.

Comment 5

[Andrew Schultz]

the behavior of the testcase changed between linux trunk 2004020207 and
2004020308.  older builds honored both paddings, at the cost of the width
specification.

Is the new behavior correct?

Comment 6

[Barak]

Well.. what Andrew noted seems to be the problem
so this bug is probably a dup of some bug i couldn't find.

Comment 7

[Andrew Schultz]

*** Bug 239775 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8

[Barak]

this is a dup of bug 249828

Comment 9

[Andrew Schultz]

yup

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 249828 ***