239904 - No message marked for deletion indication in Pinstripe theme

Status: RESOLVED INVALID

(Camino Graveyard :: General, defect)

Description

[Matt Walton]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040330 Camino/0.7+
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040330 Camino/0.7+

In the list of messages in a folder on an IMAP account, when you have the
account set up to mark messages for deletion instead of moving them to Trash or
deleting them immediately, the Pinstripe theme doesn't display any indication at
all that there is a deletion indication on that message. The previous default
theme did so.

I don't use POP3 so I don't know if this applies there as well as I'm not even
sure if the functionality is applicable.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Set IMAP account to mark messages for deletion instead of any of the other
options for what happens when the delete function is used
2. Ensure using Pinstripe theme
3. Delete a message

Actual Results:  
The message was marked for deletion (as evidenced by subsequent use of Compact
Folders causing it to disappear), but no visual indication appeared, although if
the message was unread it would be marked as read.

Expected Results:  
The message should have a visual flag of some kind added to it to indicate its
status as pending deletion. Other themes use a cross of some sort over the
message icon; Ximian Evolution renders the message's sender, subject, date etc.
in strikethrough text. What it is doesn't matter so much as that it's there.

Mac OS X Panther 10.3.3

Comment 1

[Matt Walton]

Forgot to mention Thunderbird build information:

Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5+ (20040404)

is what's reported by the about box. It's a nightly build from ftp.mozilla.org;
I haven't been able to get any of the more recent ones to run.

Comment 2

[Mike Pinkerton (not reading bugmail)]

this has nothing to do with camino, which doesn't use the pinstrip theme. it's
native.

Comment 3

[Matt Walton]

I know, my mistake. For some reason I couldn't find the bug after I'd reported
it and apologise. Should've been filed for Thunderbird. Where in fact it was
already reported anyway. Just call me useless.

Comment 4

[Mike Pinkerton (not reading bugmail)]

:-D