"everywhere applicable" doesn't mean what the author intended

VERIFIED FIXED in Bugzilla 2.16

Status

()

defect
--
minor
VERIFIED FIXED
15 years ago
7 years ago

People

(Reporter: timeless, Assigned: Niels.Reedijk)

Tracking

2.17.6
Bugzilla 2.16
Bug Flags:
approval +

Details

()

Attachments

(1 attachment)

Reporter

Description

15 years ago
10   The documentation is written in DocBook 4.1.2, and attempts to adhere
 11 to the LinuxDoc standards everywhere applicable (http://www.tldp.org).

s/every// is probably sufficient
Assignee

Comment 1

15 years ago
It certainly is a strange phrase. This straightens it out.
Reporter

Updated

15 years ago
Attachment #147793 - Flags: review+
Reporter

Updated

15 years ago
Flags: approval?
Reporter

Updated

15 years ago
Assignee: documentation → n.reedijk
Flags: approval? → approval+

Updated

15 years ago
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Hardware: PC → All

Comment 2

15 years ago
This needs to be checked into both the tip and 2_16-BRANCH.
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.16

Comment 3

15 years ago
Checking in README.docs;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/README.docs,v  <--  README.docs
new revision: 1.10; previous revision: 1.9
done
Checking in README.docs;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/README.docs,v  <--  README.docs
new revision: 1.6.2.4; previous revision: 1.6.2.3
done

Changed resolution to FIXED.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter

Updated

15 years ago
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.