User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040406 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040406 When one deletes a column in a table and there are cells in the next column that are joined, this join is dropped and new cells are inserted. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create a table of 7 rows/5 cols 2. Join cells (4,2) until (4,3). (for the result see: http://kok.thuis99.org/testoo/test_col_delete.html) 3. Delete col 3. 4. The whole layout is messed up as one can see on page http://kok.thuis99.org/testoo/test_col_delete_fail.html Actual Results: The restult can be seen on page: http://kok.thuis99.org/testoo/test_col_delete_fail.html Expected Results: I would like only column 3 to be removed. And I would like to see this as the result: http://kok.thuis99.org/testoo/test_col_delete_ok.html
One also loses some cells that should not have been deleted.
Summary: Losing cell-join when deleting a column/collum/colom → Losing cell-join and cells when deleting a column/collum/colom
Created attachment 146013 [details] The table with the correct cells deleted (done manually so we know what is going on)
do you know of if this is a regression, or when the problem was introduced? down to trying to fix critical regressions for 1.7
cc bernd in case this has impact in table code...
This sounds relatively obscure, doesn't sound like a regression, and doesn't seem likely to be fixed for 1.7.
Flags: blocking1.7? → blocking1.7-
This is an automated message, with ID "auto-resolve01". This bug has had no comments for a long time. Statistically, we have found that bug reports that have not been confirmed by a second user after three months are highly unlikely to be the source of a fix to the code. While your input is very important to us, our resources are limited and so we are asking for your help in focussing our efforts. If you can still reproduce this problem in the latest version of the product (see below for how to obtain a copy) or, for feature requests, if it's not present in the latest version and you still believe we should implement it, please visit the URL of this bug (given at the top of this mail) and add a comment to that effect, giving more reproduction information if you have it. If it is not a problem any longer, you need take no action. If this bug is not changed in any way in the next two weeks, it will be automatically resolved. Thank you for your help in this matter. The latest beta releases can be obtained from: Firefox: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/ Thunderbird: http://www.mozilla.org/products/thunderbird/releases/1.5beta1.html Seamonkey: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/
This bug has been automatically resolved after a period of inactivity (see above comment). If anyone thinks this is incorrect, they should feel free to reopen it.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.