Closed
Bug 245075
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Need a command-line script to send unsent bugmail
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Email Notifications, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 2.18
People
(Reporter: justdave, Assigned: justdave)
Details
Attachments
(4 files)
1.77 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
6.65 KB,
patch
|
goobix
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
702 bytes,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
1.19 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
There is a fair bit of evidence that we're still losing bugmail somewhere...
Until those situations are resolved, we still need a command line program to
send it that can be run from cron on a regular basis. We used to do this with
"processmail rescanall", but processmail went away, and that job is now done
from the web with sanitycheck.cgi.
We have a script we've been using for this at bugzilla.mozilla.org. We need to
make sure it gets included with Bugzilla.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
Here's the script we've been using at b.m.o.
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: blocking2.18+
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.18
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: documentation?
Flags: documentation2.18?
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/contrib/sendunsentbugmail.pl,v
done
Checking in sendunsentbugmail.pl;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/contrib/sendunsentbugmail.pl,v <--
sendunsentbugmail.pl
initial revision: 1.1
done
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
and on the 2.18 branch:
Checking in sendunsentbugmail.pl;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/contrib/sendunsentbugmail.pl,v <--
sendunsentbugmail.pl
new revision: 1.1.2.1; previous revision: 1.1
done
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
* New section on sendunsentbugmail.pl
* Changed the comment that the rest of the files in Contrib hadn't been updated
since before 2.16 from a sentence to a WARNING, so people would be less likely
to miss it.
* Re-formatted the rest of the patches.xml file to make it congruent with the
formatting we're trying to work towards in the rest of the docs.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #166016 -
Flags: review?(documentation)
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 166016 [details] [diff] [review]
Doc changes for 2.18 and tip
I'm not sure if we should use "USAGE" capitalized. Maybe
<emphasis>Usage</emphasis> or something like that.
Otherwise looks good.
Attachment #166016 -
Flags: review?(documentation) → review+
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
Checking in docs/xml/patches.xml;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/xml/patches.xml,v <-- patches.xml
new revision: 1.18; previous revision: 1.17
done
Checking in docs/xml/patches.xml;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/xml/patches.xml,v <-- patches.xml
new revision: 1.17.2.1; previous revision: 1.17
done
Flags: documentation?
Flags: documentation2.18?
Flags: documentation2.18+
Flags: documentation+
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
The checkin caused the tree to break. I'll commit this to fix it.
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
Checking in docs/xml/patches.xml;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/xml/patches.xml,v <-- patches.xml
new revision: 1.20; previous revision: 1.19
done
Checking in docs/xml/patches.xml;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/xml/patches.xml,v <-- patches.xml
new revision: 1.17.2.3; previous revision: 1.17.2.2
done
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
Tree is still burning after the fix. Commiting this second fix:
Checking in docs/xml/patches.xml;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/xml/patches.xml,v <-- patches.xml
new revision: 1.21; previous revision: 1.20
done
Checking in docs/xml/patches.xml;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/docs/xml/patches.xml,v <-- patches.xml
new revision: 1.17.2.4; previous revision: 1.17.2.3
done
Updated•12 years ago
|
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•