24774 - Attached HTML webpage doesn't render correctly

Status: VERIFIED FIXED

(SeaMonkey :: MailNews: Message Display, defect, P2)

Description

[Henrik Gemal]

If you go to:
http://my.netscape.com/ and select File -> Send Page...
and send it to both a Mozilla account and a Netscape 4.7 the mail will render 
correctly in Netscape 4.7 but not in Mozilla

Using build 2000012008

Comment 1

[lchiang]

Henrik - what happens?  How does it not render correctly?  Does it render 
correctly from the browser?

Comment 2

[Henrik Gemal]

The first line of the attached HTML page is shown as:
<620) "WIDTH=620";}; WIDTH=96% ID="header">
There after the actual HTML page comes but not in rows but on one big row. See 
the attached image...

Comment 3

[Henrik Gemal]

Attachment: my.netscape.com attached HTML page doesn't render correct

Comment 4

[Phil Peterson]

Reassign to rhp for M14. Rich, are we eating bits before they get to layout, or
is layout misrendering the page?

Comment 5

[rhp (gone)]

Let me investigate.

- rhp

Comment 6

[rhp (gone)]

I think this is a layout problem. If I just save off the attached HTML file 
(attach.htm), and load that into Mozilla, I get the line:

               <620) "WIDTH=620";}; WIDTH=96% ID="header">

then a reload and nothing. I am attaching the attach.htm file (which seems to 
load fine in 4.x) to this bug report.

- rhp

Comment 7

[rhp (gone)]

Attachment: This is the file that I attached and had problems with.

Comment 8

[harishd]

Attachment: my.netscape.com saved in Mozilla [ Note there missing LAYER tag after BODY ]

Comment 9

[harishd]

Attachment: my.netscape.com saved in Nav4.x [ Note for the LAYER tag after BODY ]

Comment 10

[Asa Dotzler [:asa]]

quick note: could this be the same as 27113

Comment 11

[harishd]

Moving to my plate.

Comment 12

[harishd]

Moving to M16.

Comment 13

[harishd]

M16 candidate .

Comment 14

[harishd]

Attachment: A reduced case..

Comment 15

[harishd]

This bug causes my.netscape.com to display incorrectly. Could be an important 
fix for beta2.

Comment 16

[harishd]

The problem arised due to the '<' inside script entity [ badly placed ].

Note: A well placed script entity will be parsed correctly.

Marking FIXED.

Comment 17

[Henrik Gemal]

Didn't quite get that. Has anything been fixed or it the HTML just invalid?

Comment 18

[harishd]

Yes, I checked in a fix to handle the malformedness ( refer to my attachment ).
BTW, my changes went in yesterday...so probably you should verify this on 
tomorrows build.

Comment 19

[Henrik Gemal]

Verified!