Closed
Bug 248213
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Update extension GooglebarL10N
Categories
(addons.mozilla.org Graveyard :: Public Pages, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: Alexander_Pircher, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
101.54 KB,
application/x-xpinstall
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 Googlebar is only listed as Extension for Firefox (http://update.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php?id=33&vid=34&category=Search%20Tools) Also list this as a Mozilla Extension. Also please add GooglebarL10N to Mozilla & Firefox Extensions which is the localized version of Googlebar: http://googlebarl10n.mozdev.org/ Both should be listed in Category "Search Tools". Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Please list the versions of Mozilla 1.x that these work with, as well as XPI URLs so that I don't have to hunt for them.
Assignee: nobody → 9quawbieby0001
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
Alan, Please get the latest one for firefox, as the .16 said it worked w/version 0.7 - 0.9. That version is 0.9.0.20 and works much better with the changes. the url for Firefox 0.8+ is http://downloads.mozdev.org/googlebar/XPI-firefox.xpi the url's for all seamonkey and pre firefox 0.8+ http://downloads.mozdev.org/googlebar/XPI-stable.xpi The translated versions require a parameter to be passed to the installer. German (de-AT/de-CH/de-DE) http://googlebarl10n.mozdev.org/googlebarl10n/0.8.0.22/googlebarl10n-0_8.xpi?de-AT Italian (it-IT) http://googlebarl10n.mozdev.org/googlebarl10n/0.8.0.22/googlebarl10n-0_8.xpi?it-IT Spanish (es-ES) http://googlebarl10n.mozdev.org/googlebarl10n/0.8.0.22/googlebarl10n-0_8.xpi?es-ES
We do not handle localized extensions yet. There's already a bug filed. But I'll put a link to that section of your site.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
http://googlebarl10n.mozdev.org/googlebarl10n/0.8.0.22/googlebarl10n-0_8.xpi without the parameter will work too. The Install-Dialog will be in English, but afterwards it will run in the language set in the Browser-Preferences (if available, currently: German, Italian, Spanish).
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
GooglebarL10N is for Searching within Google like Googlebar. The only difference is that GooglebarL10N is the localized version of Googlebar, which means that the Menues & Texts are written in (at the moment) German, Italian or Spanish.
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
Ok, hold the presses. In our testing, upgrading does not work. It results in that lovely perma-box "upgrading" and in some cases, a dead profile. The (about to be) attached 0.9.20 xpi works fine on a clean install. I'm betting the problem is in FF -- and highly suggest we hold off pushing a browser killing update to 10's of thousands of people. We'll update this bug with results with the 9.1 branch asap. Are there known successes of upgrade working with 0.9? We do have a few more features/fixes scheduled to land this weekend (Google Local fun!), so please do not use the attached file in any event. In the googlebar tradition of not adhering to the one-idea-per-bug rule, is there a bug somewhere detailing how extension developers are meant to interact with u.m.o in the future? I love bugzilla, but this is RELEASE EARLY, RELEASE OFTEN territory.
Comment 9•20 years ago
|
||
Only try this with a profile you care about if you have never installed googlebar.
Comment 10•20 years ago
|
||
In the future, you'll be able to maintain your listing yourself. Until then, just reopen this bug. I was ok installing 0.9.0.20, but if you're saying that it doesn't install over the old one cleanly... have you tried just uninstalling the old one first? Maybe the old one doesn't uninstall cleanly.
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
In the future, please don't attach XPIs to bugs, but rather just include a link for download it from. Thanks.
Comment 12•20 years ago
|
||
They linked to the XPIs at the top of this bug; it's in the queue already, so don't approve the Firefox one until this is straightened out.
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
Ok, sorry for the bad form, but I'm not convinced that Firefox 0.9 is capable of updating an extension. Uninstalling does allow 0.9.20 to install, but that doesn't help us in the case of u.m.o. Other experience with attempted updates in a Uzilla project also resulted in a corrupted profile.
Comment 14•20 years ago
|
||
What's the status here? and does this affect Googlebar or GooglebarL1ON?
Comment 15•20 years ago
|
||
Unless an error can be found in the attached .xpi, it's our conclusion that FF 0.9 does not have functional update. So hold the presses on the firefox versions until 0.9.1. We'll update the xpi's with a minimum version of 0.9.1 for u.m.o and explain the whole sordid story at mozdev. The international versions are Mozilla only I believe and are ready for posting.
Comment 16•20 years ago
|
||
Reopen for Firefox whenever you get it straight.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: In queue
Comment 17•20 years ago
|
||
Uh, ok. But this situation resolves from bugs in Firefox, not googlebar for the record. It's not us that needs straightening :) The installer does work in Firefox 0.9.1 correctly even with a previous googlebar install. However, this still leaves 0.9 users in a lurch as installing over there existing googlebar install will kill their browser. We tried to use the install.rdf to limit the installer to version 0.9.1 of Firefox -- no go. The inability to recognize the .y in x.x.y version restrictions is a serious issue.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Comment 18•20 years ago
|
||
Internally, Firefox 0.9.1 thinks it is 0.9 for compatibility's sake. Not that it makes you feel any better, but that's why. Whatever problem you guys are having with Firefox itself, file a bug against the extension manager or whatever. Feel free to reference this bug, etc. I've had other upgrades go fine, as long as the update.rdf isn't on UMO.
Comment 19•20 years ago
|
||
Leaving a quick "first version" on mozilla's "update" facility, was hardly our intention. Quoting Andy Ed, "RELEASE EARLY, RELEASE OFTEN", we do. The versioning routes taken by firefox devs have left us no choice but to wait for firefox version 1.0, unless you can work with us to improve the situation somewhat. That would leave much to be desired... putting it kindly. Suggestions or requests, however you want to take it. 1. Can we include an advisory string in an rdf update notice? I suspect not. I see nothing in Ben's api description providing for it.(If there is no way for us to give alerts/instructions to our users... then someone needs to fix that.) 2. There should also be an "Uninstall then Update" tag/directive in the EM. In the real world they call it r&r, remove and replace. 3. Is there any headway being made on developers having a way to interact with users? (Just watching people comment is less than we are used to doing, as we like to help them out in a pinch.)
Comment 20•20 years ago
|
||
Changes to the API need to be addressed in bugs for the Extensions component. If you like, we can unhide your email address so that people can mail you.
Comment 21•20 years ago
|
||
This is more about the u.m.o, than the changes made to the next Firefox. The main issue is... Leaving a quick "first version" on mozilla's "update" facility, was hardly our intention. Quoting Andy Ed, "RELEASE EARLY, RELEASE OFTEN", we do. Well how about item 3? It would seem appropriate, if there is the possibility of trashing browsers in mass, then there should be a place reserved for our responses in the blame game that will quite naturally follow? I'd like to try and find some solutions here. If I have to put out a custom version for u.m.o, fine. My email address? It looks visible here... but I'm not looking for any more spam... can't stand the stuff. :)
Comment 22•20 years ago
|
||
If you have a new version, then reopen this bug. Eventually you'll be able to update UMO yourself. If you have your own update.rdf, say on mozdev, then that can point people to downloading updates from mozdev.
Comment 23•20 years ago
|
||
We have had ten new versions since u.m.o put ours out. The concern here is if we update the u.m.o version... alot of browsers will be rendered useless. We are currently distributing 0.9.0.26! The file you have distributed, has hardcoded in the install.rdf, that update information is available from your site. Those firefoxes will ask your site. We omitted the <em:updateURL> tag, thus leaving Firefox to ask you about update information. Leaving those users with version 0.9.0.16 for 3 months is not acceptable.
Comment 24•20 years ago
|
||
The web service that is supposed to run on UMO is not working, afaik. This is why I recommend you host your own update.rdf. Any change to the API will still need to be done by Ben.
Comment 25•20 years ago
|
||
Folks, I don't think the problem is clear here: Based on our testing, if we trigger an update at u.m.o to our latest version, any FireFox 0.9 user who installs will end up with a corrupted profile. We're trying to avoid that problem. Clearly, we can't change 0.9. We can change u.m.o. A simple warning message would solve our problems. It would read (triggered only by a 0.9.0 user agent): "CAUTION! Please uninstall Googlebar before upgrading. Alternatively, upgrade to the latest Firefox". For that matter, with the ability to load in custom HTML, we could actually hide the update link and present the matter more forcefully.
Comment 26•20 years ago
|
||
You're really barking up the wrong bug. But I really wonder why it is that users of your extension booger their profiles, but not other extensions do not.
Comment 27•20 years ago
|
||
in #24
> The web service that is supposed to run on UMO is not working, afaik.
What does this mean... no extension update information is available to firefoxes
that ask for it? The server does not answer with any version information?
If the answer to that is yes... well we can just make an update ready.
Comment 28•20 years ago
|
||
[ "But I really wonder why it is that users of your extension booger their profiles, but not other extensions do not." ] I'm not going to take that... that's a bunch of bull. Take a look... bug 246687 bug 246935 learn something. and likely caused by what's briefly mentioned in bug 248971 I agree with Jason Chu's comment in bug 246687#c27
Comment 29•20 years ago
|
||
Let's be civil; at any one time, anybody's extension is screwing up somebody's Firefox profile. I've had my own extensions bite me when I've tested install.rdf based install, although my Fx builds are bleeding-edge : ]
Comment 30•20 years ago
|
||
Indeed, I can't argue that we're barking up the wrong bug. However, can you provide an example of an extension that works in 0.9 with an install.rdf update? We believe there really is a bug there, likely due to localization, but have not heard of anyone successfully updating running 0.9. A post to mozdev project owners yielded no reports. Thx.
Comment 31•20 years ago
|
||
I've successfully used the updater for a few of Pike's extensions. I'm not sure what you mean.
Comment 32•20 years ago
|
||
1. The latest Googlebar for Firefox is 0.9.0.27, start distributing that xpi, the url for which is http://downloads.mozdev.org/googlebar/XPI-firefox.xpi but at the same time... 2. NOT create an "update available" rdf file, which triggers update notifications available to End Users, then do so. The aim here is to update the file, and avoid BLIND end user automatic upgrading. I might as well put them all in one spot so I can find 'em later. Here's another one. http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=85021
Comment 33•20 years ago
|
||
> but at the same time...
> 2. NOT create an "update available" rdf file, which triggers update
> notifications available to End Users, then do so.
For the record, the Update service that Firefox checks to trigger that update
for Extensions/Themes, is not implemented yet, it's planned to be up by 1.0RC1.
Therefore, Firefox gets no automated information about Updated Extensions and
Themes unless you've specified a custom update.rdf in the extension install.rdf.
What will happen when the service is set up and 0.9/0.9.x browsers ask it? That
I don't think is known. :-/ So, updating the file on the site will not cause
any non end-user caused updating.
Putting a warning for Version Notes for this version to warn 0.9.0 users to
uninstall first is a good idea for this situation. and about the only thing that
can be done.
Comment 34•20 years ago
|
||
wolf, ["For the record, the Update service that Firefox checks to trigger that update for Extensions/Themes, is not implemented yet, it's planned to be up by 1.0RC1."] I had asked for this information earlier. same bug 248213#24 Thanks for clearing this up. Browser stats reveal there are still 0.9.0 users in sufficient numbers to prevent any automatic update possibility. If extensions could restrict installations with subminor version numbers, this would have been easy to handle.
Comment 35•20 years ago
|
||
So implement a bogus update.rdf URL in your install.rdf. That will override the web service. People won't know you have an update available, and may file a bug against UMO, but it would cover your situation.
Status: REOPENED → ASSIGNED
Comment 36•20 years ago
|
||
Googlebar version 0.9.0.27 has been added to the Mozilla Update database and is awaiting review
Whiteboard: In queue
Comment 37•20 years ago
|
||
As long as it will be just the file... and not an update.rdf for the googlebar. Just make 2 changes to the file you have, version 0.9.0.27... 1. Change the versionMax to 0.9 in the install.rdf. 2. The updateURL will be http://googlebar.mozdev.org/update.rdf The file is there but being served as text/plain instead of text/rdf, but it is better than no file at all. Since there is no way for us dev's to interact with the user, and we have to go through you... for everything... I am preparing an update to that file that will have updates pointed to mozdev. In short, it will be best to let it break, or stay just in the 0.9+ series. (I am currently reading Ben's new stuff on what the EM is capable of now.) I surely hope he has created a remove and replace tag we can use, as references to missing overlays... Firefox's Communicator compatibility layers not ours!, require it.
Comment 38•20 years ago
|
||
I made the xpi with those changes... and put it on a site that will serve it immediately, unlike mozdev, which takes 2 hours and then those secondary mirrors take unknown amounts of time... to retrieve it. Some even stop once in a while. So for now, you can grab 0.9.0.28 at: http://mysite.verizon.net/johnrw/public/XPI-firefox.xpi which has the changes that point the update.rdf to mozdev.
Comment 39•20 years ago
|
||
Your site is serving it up as plain text. Try renaming it to .zip
Comment 40•20 years ago
|
||
I have written Verizon's admin about this... because I can't treat the problem using an .htaccess file with the appropriate mime setting for .xpi files. Shift clicking will give a save as dialog. I just let mozilla download the whole thing in the content area, and than save as works also. The zip still checks out fine. Okay, I'll rename it. http://mysite.verizon.net/johnrw/public/XPI-firefox_0_9_0_28.xpi.zip By the way... there is a theme for Mozilla, with Arvid Axelsson's Qute theme there. I noticed you have no themes for Mozilla. I have Arvid's approval to put that here, as he looked it over for QC concerns etc. So as long as you give the credit to the theme as... Artwork: Arvid Axellson Assembly:Robert Morris and John Woods ...everything is okay. It works in 1.7.1 and 1.6, but may need some touching up for 1.8. It installs in 1.8 fine but I noticed some cosmetic differences.(or thought i did) that is at: http://mysite.verizon.net/johnrw/public/quteMoz.jar there is also an xpi... but Arvid's one condition was that there would be no XPI used. Do I need to do this on another bug?
Comment 41•20 years ago
|
||
Firefox version is now also in the queue. Please file a separate bug for Qute, since someone with Moz 1.x (ie not me) will need to verify it.
Comment 42•20 years ago
|
||
Making its way to the mirrors.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago → 20 years ago
Hardware: PC → All
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 43•20 years ago
|
||
what the heck is taking this update so long?
Comment 44•20 years ago
|
||
You'll need to be more specific than that. It is possible that you're seeing a manifestation of bug 248919
Whiteboard: In queue
Comment 45•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #43) > what the heck is taking this update so long? There's not any version of Googlebar or GoolebarL10N in the pending queue, everything that's been added to it has been approved. If it's just that you're not seeing the newest version over an older, then that is Bug 248919.
Comment 46•20 years ago
|
||
Please add this to the extensions for mozilla suite. It is version 0.9.0.28 for mozilla suite and (firefox below 0.8+) only. I also noticed people are trying to install the Firefox stuff into mozilla 1.7.2. (and giving poor reviews for it's failure.) The link "Install Now" should read Install for Firefox if umo doesn't use the useragent in selecting the file to use. (They seem to be hardcoded links.) Are there any plans to use the useragent string when processing this link? http://downloads.us-east3.mozdev.org/googlebar/XPI-rimental.xpi
Comment 47•20 years ago
|
||
Since we use 2 different installers, and maintain them... maybe the moreinfo page should have 2 install links... where people can see there is a choice.
Comment 48•20 years ago
|
||
ok fellas... Xpi for the next firefox version. This XPI is for firefox version 1.0 ONLY. http://mysite.verizon.net/johnrw/public/XPI-firefox_0_9_0_29.xpi When are you guys going to get the developer response area finished?
Updated•20 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 49•20 years ago
|
||
Dev panel is bug 254925. The website is supposed to be doing userAgent detection.
Comment 50•20 years ago
|
||
In the future, can you include an install.rdf in the moz 1.x package, too? Its optional (bug 246891), but will make UMO easier to administer. Moz 0.9.0.28 and FX 0.9.0.29 now in queue
Status: REOPENED → ASSIGNED
Whiteboard: In queue
Comment 51•20 years ago
|
||
The queue has been approved. If you get a 404 error after 30 minutes, please reopen bug 259282. If the link installs the wrong version, please comment on bug 259410.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago → 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•20 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 52•20 years ago
|
||
Here's the Googlebar for Firefox 1.0 location. thanks. http://downloads.mozdev.org/googlebar/XPI-firefox-1_0.xpi
Comment 53•20 years ago
|
||
According to the status whiteboard, your item has been tested and added to the queue. The queue has now been approved. If your update does not appear on the site, please reopen this bug and clear the status whiteboard.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago → 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•20 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 54•20 years ago
|
||
This doesn't appear to have been processed, it was wrongly resolved.
Status: REOPENED → NEW
Whiteboard: In queue
Comment 55•20 years ago
|
||
alan, it's been days and no googlebar update... please leave this bug open until the thing shows up for the install now link. Also the new version is 0.9.0.30 for the firefox 1.0 version.
Comment 56•20 years ago
|
||
The queue has been approved. Please be sure to clear the status whiteboard when you reopen a bug. Thanks.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago → 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 57•20 years ago
|
||
Bulk Moving Extension/Theme listing bugs to new component. (Filter: masslistingspam)
Component: Update → Listings
Product: mozilla.org → Update
Version: other → unspecified
Reporter | ||
Comment 58•20 years ago
|
||
The international Version of Googlebar for Firefox 1.0 has been released (based on Googlebar 0.9.0.30 for Firefox 1.0): GooglebarL10N with at the moment (English), German, Italian and French: http://downloads.mozdev.org/googlebarl10n/0.9/googlebarl10n-firefox-1_0.xpi Du to the mirror-concept of mozdev it may take still a few hours to get the URL working. PS.: WTF is the Status Whiteboard?
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 59•20 years ago
|
||
Status whieboard: the box at the top of the bug form. The thing I just cleared.
Whiteboard: In queue
Comment 60•20 years ago
|
||
Prevented by http://bugzilla.mozdev.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8203
Comment 62•20 years ago
|
||
GooglebarL10N identifies itself as Googlebar instead of GooglebarL10N, so I can't approve 0.9.0.30 of it.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago → 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Summary: Add Extensions Googlebar for Mozilla and GooglebarL10N for Mozilla & Firefox → Update extension GooglebarL10N
Whiteboard: needs testing
Comment 63•18 years ago
|
||
AMO BUGSPAM FOR COMPONENT MOVE AND DELETE (FILTER ME)
Component: Listings → Web Site
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Product: addons.mozilla.org → addons.mozilla.org Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•