Closed
Bug 251241
Opened 21 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
Both zh-Hant and zh-Hans are treated as zh-CN
Categories
(Core :: Internationalization, defect)
Core
Internationalization
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: jshin1987, Assigned: jshin1987)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: fixed-aviary1.0, fixed1.7, intl)
Attachments
(1 file)
862 bytes,
patch
|
smontagu
:
review+
neil
:
superreview+
bugs
:
approval-aviary+
mkaply
:
approval1.7.5+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
In the test case at the URL given in the URL field, zh-Hant and zh-Hans are both
treated as zh. We can easily fix this problem by adding two entries to the
mapping table (langGroups.properties). However, it might not be the best way to
deal with the problem in general.
zh-hans=zh-CN
zh-hant=zh-TW
Richard, you can edit the file (in 'res' subdirectory of your mozilla
installation directory) to add the entries above.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•21 years ago
|
||
Simon, what do you think of adding two entries to langGroups.properties file?
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
I am OK with it as a quick fix, but ideally we want to move towards a general
solution for parsing ISO 15924 script codes as part of the lang attribute.
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
I fully agree with you about the characteristic of the patch (an intertim
patch) so that I added a comment to that effect.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 154466 [details] [diff] [review]
a quick fix
asking for r/sr
as an quick --> as a quick fix.
they have ... revisited => the issue has ... revisited.
Attachment #154466 -
Flags: superreview?(blizzard)
Attachment #154466 -
Flags: review?(smontagu)
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #154466 -
Flags: review?(smontagu) → review+
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
Note, for clarity, that zh-hans and zh-hant are actually defined by IANA as
language tags, though they use iso 15924 script codes. Note also that the
so-called rfc3066bis will support the use of script codes within language tags.
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
Yes indeed: rfc3066bis is the hidden leitmotif behind my comment 2 (and various
similar comments in other bugs - e.g. bug 192636)
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 154466 [details] [diff] [review]
a quick fix
trying Neil for sr.
this is a trivial fix although it's sort of a stop-gap.
Attachment #154466 -
Flags: superreview?(blizzard) → superreview?(neil.parkwaycc.co.uk)
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #154466 -
Flags: superreview?(neil.parkwaycc.co.uk) → superreview+
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 154466 [details] [diff] [review]
a quick fix
thanks for sr.
fix checked into the trunk.
asking for a for check-in to aviary-1.0 and 1.7 branches
This is a trivial fix but it'd be nice to fix this for 1.7 branch/aviary-1.0
Attachment #154466 -
Flags: approval1.7.3?
Attachment #154466 -
Flags: approval-aviary?
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
Attachment #154466 -
Flags: approval-aviary? → approval-aviary+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
thanks for a. fixed on aviary-1.0
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: fixed-aviary1.0
Comment 11•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 154466 [details] [diff] [review]
a quick fix
a=mkaply for 1.7.3
Attachment #154466 -
Flags: approval1.7.3? → approval1.7.3+
When this was landed on aviary 1.0, it was merged manually, with s/the/this/,
which causes pain for those synchronizing branches. Please use cvs to merge
patches to branches.
Keywords: fixed-aviary1.0
Whiteboard: fixed-aviary1.0
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•