Closed Bug 255741 Opened 20 years ago Closed 20 years ago

XMLHTTPRequest POST includes CRLF in the beginning of the postdata packet

Categories

(Core :: XML, defect)

x86
All
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WORKSFORME

People

(Reporter: lpgcritter+bugz, Assigned: hjtoi-bugzilla)

Details

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040626 Firefox/0.9.1 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040626 Firefox/0.9.1 When POSTing data, a normal request would have the headers in one packet and then the post data in the second packet. The header packet should end with two CRLFs signifying the end of the HTTP headers. When using XMLHTTPRequest to POST, XMLHTTPRequest puts one CRLF in the end of the header packet and another in the post data packet. This confuses some web servers, making the request fail. These dumps are courtesy of bug 246651 Using POST in XMLHTTPRequest 00000000 50 4f 53 54 20 2f 20 48 54 54 50 2f 31 2e 31 0d POST / H TTP/1.1. 00000010 0a 48 6f 73 74 3a 20 6c 6f 63 61 6c 68 6f 73 74 .Host: l ocalhost 00000020 3a 38 30 38 30 0d 0a 55 73 65 72 2d 41 67 65 6e :8080..U ser-Agen 00000030 74 3a 20 4d 6f 7a 69 6c 6c 61 2f 35 2e 30 20 28 t: Mozil la/5.0 ( 00000040 58 31 31 3b 20 55 3b 20 4c 69 6e 75 78 20 78 38 X11; U; Linux x8 00000050 36 5f 36 34 3b 20 65 6e 2d 55 53 3b 20 72 76 3a 6_64; en -US; rv: 00000060 31 2e 37 72 63 31 29 20 47 65 63 6b 6f 2f 32 30 1.7rc1) Gecko/20 00000070 30 34 30 35 32 38 0d 0a 41 63 63 65 70 74 3a 20 040528.. Accept: 00000080 74 65 78 74 2f 78 6d 6c 2c 61 70 70 6c 69 63 61 text/xml ,applica 00000090 74 69 6f 6e 2f 78 6d 6c 2c 61 70 70 6c 69 63 61 tion/xml ,applica 000000A0 74 69 6f 6e 2f 78 68 74 6d 6c 2b 78 6d 6c 2c 74 tion/xht ml+xml,t 000000B0 65 78 74 2f 68 74 6d 6c 3b 71 3d 30 2e 39 2c 74 ext/html ;q=0.9,t 000000C0 65 78 74 2f 70 6c 61 69 6e 3b 71 3d 30 2e 38 2c ext/plai n;q=0.8, 000000D0 69 6d 61 67 65 2f 70 6e 67 2c 2a 2f 2a 3b 71 3d image/pn g,*/*;q= 000000E0 30 2e 35 0d 0a 41 63 63 65 70 74 2d 4c 61 6e 67 0.5..Acc ept-Lang 000000F0 75 61 67 65 3a 20 65 6e 2d 75 73 2c 65 6e 3b 71 uage: en -us,en;q 00000100 3d 30 2e 35 0d 0a 41 63 63 65 70 74 2d 45 6e 63 =0.5..Ac cept-Enc 00000110 6f 64 69 6e 67 3a 20 67 7a 69 70 2c 64 65 66 6c oding: g zip,defl 00000120 61 74 65 0d 0a 41 63 63 65 70 74 2d 43 68 61 72 ate..Acc ept-Char 00000130 73 65 74 3a 20 49 53 4f 2d 38 38 35 39 2d 31 2c set: ISO -8859-1, 00000140 75 74 66 2d 38 3b 71 3d 30 2e 37 2c 2a 3b 71 3d utf-8;q= 0.7,*;q= 00000150 30 2e 37 0d 0a 4b 65 65 70 2d 41 6c 69 76 65 3a 0.7..Kee p-Alive: 00000160 20 33 30 30 0d 0a 43 6f 6e 6e 65 63 74 69 6f 6e 300..Co nnection 00000170 3a 20 6b 65 65 70 2d 61 6c 69 76 65 0d 0a 43 6f : keep-a live..Co 00000180 6e 74 65 6e 74 2d 54 79 70 65 3a 20 74 65 78 74 ntent-Ty pe: text 00000190 2f 78 6d 6c 0d 0a 43 6f 6e 74 65 6e 74 2d 4c 65 /xml..Co ntent-Le 000001A0 6e 67 74 68 3a 20 38 31 0d 0a 50 72 61 67 6d 61 ngth: 81 ..Pragma 000001B0 3a 20 6e 6f 2d 63 61 63 68 65 0d 0a 43 61 63 68 : no-cac he..Cach 000001C0 65 2d 43 6f 6e 74 72 6f 6c 3a 20 6e 6f 2d 63 61 e-Contro l: no-ca 000001D0 63 68 65 0d 0a che.. 000001D5 0d 0a 3c 3f 78 6d 6c 20 76 65 72 73 69 6f 6e 3d ..<?xml version= 000001E5 22 31 2e 30 22 3f 3e 3c 6d 65 74 68 6f 64 43 61 "1.0"?>< methodCa 000001F5 6c 6c 3e 3c 6d 65 74 68 6f 64 4e 61 6d 65 3e 74 ll><meth odName>t 00000205 65 73 74 2e 71 75 65 72 79 3c 2f 6d 65 74 68 6f est.quer y</metho 00000215 64 4e 61 6d 65 3e 3c 2f 6d 65 74 68 6f 64 43 61 dName></ methodCa 00000225 6c 6c 3e 0d 0a ll>.. A normal POST request 00000000 50 4f 53 54 20 2f 20 48 54 54 50 2f 31 2e 31 0d POST / H TTP/1.1. 00000010 0a 43 6f 6e 6e 65 63 74 69 6f 6e 3a 20 63 6c 6f .Connect ion: clo 00000020 73 65 0d 0a 48 6f 73 74 3a 20 6c 6f 63 61 6c 68 se..Host : localh 00000030 6f 73 74 3a 38 30 38 30 0d 0a 55 73 65 72 2d 41 ost:8080 ..User-A 00000040 67 65 6e 74 3a 20 6c 77 70 2d 72 65 71 75 65 73 gent: lw p-reques 00000050 74 2f 32 2e 30 31 0d 0a 43 6f 6e 74 65 6e 74 2d t/2.01.. Content- 00000060 4c 65 6e 67 74 68 3a 20 38 32 0d 0a 43 6f 6e 74 Length: 82..Cont 00000070 65 6e 74 2d 54 79 70 65 3a 20 61 70 70 6c 69 63 ent-Type : applic 00000080 61 74 69 6f 6e 2f 78 2d 77 77 77 2d 66 6f 72 6d ation/x- www-form 00000090 2d 75 72 6c 65 6e 63 6f 64 65 64 0d 0a 0d 0a -urlenco ded.... 0000009F 3c 3f 78 6d 6c 20 76 65 72 73 69 6f 6e 3d 22 31 <?xml ve rsion="1 000000AF 2e 30 22 3f 3e 3c 6d 65 74 68 6f 64 43 61 6c 6c .0"?><me thodCall 000000BF 3e 3c 6d 65 74 68 6f 64 4e 61 6d 65 3e 74 65 73 ><method Name>tes 000000CF 74 2e 71 75 65 72 79 3c 2f 6d 65 74 68 6f 64 4e t.query< /methodN 000000DF 61 6d 65 3e 3c 2f 6d 65 74 68 6f 64 43 61 6c 6c ame></me thodCall 000000EF 3e 0a >. addresses 000001D0 and 0000009F are the start of a new packet, hence a new line. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
How did you determine that it's the packets sequencing that makes the request fails instead of the wrong content-length computation (bug 246651) ? Can you give more details about the server you use ?
Closing the bug... I found a typo in the post data of my code that caused the percieved failing of the POST request. After some investigation and correspondence with William, I have determined that this bug is a non-issue.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.