User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040813 Firefox/0.9.1+ Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040813 Firefox/0.9.1+ Hotkeys list is too long an unorganized and makes it hard to find a useful hotkey. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open the hotkeys page in help 2. 3. Actual Results: A long list of hotkeys Expected Results: An organized list of hotkeys
Attachment #156263 - Attachment description: proposed organization → proposed organization. I included hotkeys for the search bar
Confirming bug. Lets do this after 1.0.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Target Milestone: --- → After Firefox 1.0
Moving to new Firefox Help owner.
Assignee: rlk → jwalden+fxhelp
This is worth considering for 1.1, particularly as it would just be reorganization of line groups.
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Hardware: PC → All
Target Milestone: Future → Firefox1.1
I'll take a stab at this. A patch will come soon
Created attachment 178620 [details] [diff] [review] quick patch v1 this is a quick patch I through together. It probably needs some minor editing. Can some one take a look at it?(Jeff?)
Comment on attachment 178620 [details] [diff] [review] quick patch v1 The proper way we'll want to split this up is like so (because it's more semantically valid): <table border="1" width="100%"> <thead> <tr> <th>Command</th> <th>&brandShortName;</th> <th>Internet Explorer</th> <th>Opera</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <th colspan="4">Categorization Foo</th> </tr> <tr> <td>Add Bookmark</td> <td>&accelKey;+<kbd>D</kbd></td> <td>&accelKey;+<kbd>D</kbd></td> <td>&accelKey;+<kbd>T</kbd></td> </tr> <tr> <th colspan="4">Categorization Bar</th> </tr> <tr> <td>Something</td> <td>shortcut</td> <td>shortcut</td> <td>shortcut</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Beyond that, I need to look at the proposed categorization a bit more first. Some of the categorizations are correct and obvious, but some of the ones in the first attachment seem to be just a bit too general or buzzword-y. This'll have to wait a bit until we come up with a definitive list of categories.
Attachment #178620 - Flags: review?(jwalden+fxhelp) → review-
Created attachment 183010 [details] Possible org. scheme, feedback wanted I need feedback here. I like some of what I've got, but I don't like all of it. In particular I very, very much want to avoid having a Miscellaneous category if at all possible.
>Miscellaneous: >Complete .com Address >Complete .net Address >Complete .org Address >Delete Selected Autocomplete Entry Can't the "Complete" turn into Autocomplete? Then we can move the above into an Autocomplete catagory or soething similar.
(In reply to comment #9) > Can't the "Complete" turn into Autocomplete? > Then we can move the above into an Autocomplete catagory or soething similar. Adding "Auto" seems like a worthwhile change, but at least to me an Autocomplete category seems a good deal too specific. This would also make the Misc. category unusually small, and if we're making a category that small I'd rather see it removed. I also can't think of other items with which to augment an Autocomplete category, and I think a baseline of at least five items per category is at least a reasonable (tho if need be, breakable) goal. Also, while I'm thinking about it, we may want to change "Delete Selected Autocomplete Entry" to something like "Delete Saved Form Entry" (assuming that's clear enough) because Shift+Del applies to all form elements with saved entries.
"Complete .com Address" etc. just adds e.g. ".com". That has nothing to do with autocomplete, which offers previously entered information based on the first characters the user entered. Shift-Del also works in the location bar and the search bar, and I wouldn't call these "forms". I'm not too concerned about the misc category. I'd put Text Size Increase/Decrease/Restore next to each other. The last proposal looks pretty good otherwise.
sorry for bug spamming, but for whoever does this bug, try to help fix bug 247595 too.(by using entities)
Created attachment 183969 [details] [diff] [review] Rearrange things, more or less as described previously I moved New Message into the Miscellaneous category. It wasn't in the previous list because I made the previous list in Linux, whereas to create the patch I created the categories and then started moving shortcuts into categories one by one. I ended up with New Message, which didn't quite seem tool-like to me and thus got put in Miscellaneous. Because things are moved around so much, reading the patch doesn't do a whole lot of good; applying and testing it are probably the only way to really evaluate it. One last: the styling of this table currently looks really horrible. After this is fixed I'm going to file a bug to get something better-looking here, because this bluish color is truly ugly.
Attachment #183969 - Flags: review?(steffen.wilberg)
Comment on attachment 183969 [details] [diff] [review] Rearrange things, more or less as described previously Nice! The content, that is. The location of "New Message" as fine as well. But please do file the bug on improving the style, ugh :)
Attachment #183969 - Flags: review?(steffen.wilberg) → review+
Attachment #183969 - Flags: approval-aviary1.1a1?
Attachment #183969 - Flags: approval-aviary1.1a1? → approval-aviary1.1a1+
Patch checked in, and bug 295229 filed for the styling issues.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 14 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Version: unspecified → Trunk
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.