Closed Bug 25698 Opened 25 years ago Closed 25 years ago

increased memory usage (memory leaks?) after browsing for period of time

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: General, defect, P3)

x86
All

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED INVALID

People

(Reporter: crisrita, Assigned: leger)

References

()

Details

(Keywords: perf)

This might be important to some users. Mozilla is a ram-hog. I have 65 Mb of ram, and about 25 minutes of browsing on Mozilla eats it all up. Please try to fix this.
Although this bug was originally sparse on documentation, it has potential to be a good catch-all for leak bugs. In other words, make this bug depend on all the significant leak bugs, and then it can be used to track progress on eliminating leaks. Here's what information I can add to the leak question: On my Celeron RedHat Linux 6.0 machine with 128mb physical and 128mb virtual memory, Mozilla 2000-01-25-20 (M13) starts up using 17-18mb memory. After a recent session of extensive browsing and using mail (along with an extensive period of doing nothing with my computer), Mozilla was using around 33-34mb memory. This bug could possibly be a duplicate of bug 11935, but that bug is about Mozilla being a memory hog, not a memory leaker. In other words it talks about Mozilla using too much memory right from the start as opposed to using more memory over time. Bug 17591 is a webshell leak bug. I suspect that this bug depends on that one, although they probably aren't duplicates unless the webshell is the only thing causing leaking in Mozilla. I am adding bug 17591 as a duplicate of this bug and changing the os to all since I can duplicate this on Linux.
Depends on: 17591
OS: Windows 98 → All
Summary: Browser Bug → increased memory usage (memory leaks?) after browsing for period of time
The last time I used Mozilla on Win95 for any length of time, back in 1999 11, it would within 20 minutes eat up almost all the memory, although that memory could be released for use by other apps. On WinNT, Mozilla usually grows slowly to 25-30MB with use. So while this is an XP problem, it may show worse on some OS than on others.
Keywords: perf
Moving all open "nobody@mozilla.org" assignee bugs to "leger@netscape.com" to review.
Assignee: nobody → leger
This is silly. There have been plenty of "Mozilla slowly eats more and more memory but I won't tell you anything more" bugs, all the way back to bug 284. Marking INVALID.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
*spam* changing qa contact from nobody@mozilla.org to me (BlakeR1234@aol.com) on 121 open or resolved (but not verified) bugs. sorry for the spam everybody, but most of these bugs would just remain dormant and not checked by QA otherwise. I'm not sure how so many bugs have nobody as their QA contact, but I suspect this is the fault of some sort of bugzilla corruption that happened at some point (most of these bugs are in the 20000-26000 range, and I don't see where in the activity log that QA contact explicitly changed to nobody@mozilla.org) Anyways, sorry again for spam. If you really get annoyed, I'm usually available in #mozilla on IRC for torture.
QA Contact: nobody → BlakeR1234
There are many memory leak bugs. Query for open "mlk" keyword bugs and you'll see all 81 of them today :-) marking Verified.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.